linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
	 brauner@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
	hare@suse.de,  djwong@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] fs/jbd2: use sleeping version of __find_get_block()
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:38:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6tqny4muvkyejvokjkx6gh53ihc2duxleonzwqlkl6hn7y6w7n@r3x6dns3q6pn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415231635.83960-6-dave@stgolabs.net>

On Tue 15-04-25 16:16:33, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Convert to the new nonatomic flavor to benefit from potential
> performance benefits and adapt in the future vs migration such
> that semantics are kept.
> 
> - jbd2_journal_revoke(): can sleep (has might_sleep() in the beginning)
> 
> - jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(): only used from do_get_write_access() and
>     do_get_create_access() which do sleep. So can sleep.
> 
> - jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags() - only called from journal commit code
>     which sleeps. So can sleep.
> 
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza


> ---
>  fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 15 +++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
> index 0cf0fddbee81..1467f6790747 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_revoke(handle_t *handle, unsigned long long blocknr,
>  	bh = bh_in;
>  
>  	if (!bh) {
> -		bh = __find_get_block(bdev, blocknr, journal->j_blocksize);
> +		bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, blocknr,
> +						journal->j_blocksize);
>  		if (bh)
>  			BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "found on hash");
>  	}
> @@ -355,7 +356,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_revoke(handle_t *handle, unsigned long long blocknr,
>  
>  		/* If there is a different buffer_head lying around in
>  		 * memory anywhere... */
> -		bh2 = __find_get_block(bdev, blocknr, journal->j_blocksize);
> +		bh2 = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, blocknr,
> +						 journal->j_blocksize);
>  		if (bh2) {
>  			/* ... and it has RevokeValid status... */
>  			if (bh2 != bh && buffer_revokevalid(bh2))
> @@ -464,7 +466,8 @@ void jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle_t *handle, struct journal_head *jh)
>  	 * state machine will get very upset later on. */
>  	if (need_cancel) {
>  		struct buffer_head *bh2;
> -		bh2 = __find_get_block(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr, bh->b_size);
> +		bh2 = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr,
> +						 bh->b_size);
>  		if (bh2) {
>  			if (bh2 != bh)
>  				clear_buffer_revoked(bh2);
> @@ -492,9 +495,9 @@ void jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal_t *journal)
>  			struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *record;
>  			struct buffer_head *bh;
>  			record = (struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *)list_entry;
> -			bh = __find_get_block(journal->j_fs_dev,
> -					      record->blocknr,
> -					      journal->j_blocksize);
> +			bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(journal->j_fs_dev,
> +							record->blocknr,
> +							journal->j_blocksize);
>  			if (bh) {
>  				clear_buffer_revoked(bh);
>  				__brelse(bh);
> -- 
> 2.39.5
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-16  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-15 23:16 [PATCH -next 0/7] fs/buffer: split pagecache lookups into atomic or blocking Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 1/7] fs/buffer: split locking for pagecache lookups Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:32   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/7] fs/buffer: introduce sleeping flavors " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:33   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 3/7] fs/buffer: use sleeping version of __find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:33   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 4/7] fs/ocfs2: " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:35   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs/jbd2: " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:38   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] fs/ext4: use sleeping version of sb_find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:39   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/migrate: fix sleep in atomic for large folios and buffer heads Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16  9:43   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-16 19:27 ` [PATCH -next 0/7] fs/buffer: split pagecache lookups into atomic or blocking Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-17  9:57   ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-22 11:25   ` Jan Kara
2025-04-17  9:58 ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-18  1:59 [PATCH v2 " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-18  1:59 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs/jbd2: use sleeping version of __find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6tqny4muvkyejvokjkx6gh53ihc2duxleonzwqlkl6hn7y6w7n@r3x6dns3q6pn \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox