From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
brauner@kernel.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
hare@suse.de, djwong@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] fs/jbd2: use sleeping version of __find_get_block()
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:38:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6tqny4muvkyejvokjkx6gh53ihc2duxleonzwqlkl6hn7y6w7n@r3x6dns3q6pn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415231635.83960-6-dave@stgolabs.net>
On Tue 15-04-25 16:16:33, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Convert to the new nonatomic flavor to benefit from potential
> performance benefits and adapt in the future vs migration such
> that semantics are kept.
>
> - jbd2_journal_revoke(): can sleep (has might_sleep() in the beginning)
>
> - jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(): only used from do_get_write_access() and
> do_get_create_access() which do sleep. So can sleep.
>
> - jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags() - only called from journal commit code
> which sleeps. So can sleep.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
> index 0cf0fddbee81..1467f6790747 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_revoke(handle_t *handle, unsigned long long blocknr,
> bh = bh_in;
>
> if (!bh) {
> - bh = __find_get_block(bdev, blocknr, journal->j_blocksize);
> + bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, blocknr,
> + journal->j_blocksize);
> if (bh)
> BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "found on hash");
> }
> @@ -355,7 +356,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_revoke(handle_t *handle, unsigned long long blocknr,
>
> /* If there is a different buffer_head lying around in
> * memory anywhere... */
> - bh2 = __find_get_block(bdev, blocknr, journal->j_blocksize);
> + bh2 = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, blocknr,
> + journal->j_blocksize);
> if (bh2) {
> /* ... and it has RevokeValid status... */
> if (bh2 != bh && buffer_revokevalid(bh2))
> @@ -464,7 +466,8 @@ void jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle_t *handle, struct journal_head *jh)
> * state machine will get very upset later on. */
> if (need_cancel) {
> struct buffer_head *bh2;
> - bh2 = __find_get_block(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr, bh->b_size);
> + bh2 = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr,
> + bh->b_size);
> if (bh2) {
> if (bh2 != bh)
> clear_buffer_revoked(bh2);
> @@ -492,9 +495,9 @@ void jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal_t *journal)
> struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *record;
> struct buffer_head *bh;
> record = (struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *)list_entry;
> - bh = __find_get_block(journal->j_fs_dev,
> - record->blocknr,
> - journal->j_blocksize);
> + bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(journal->j_fs_dev,
> + record->blocknr,
> + journal->j_blocksize);
> if (bh) {
> clear_buffer_revoked(bh);
> __brelse(bh);
> --
> 2.39.5
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-15 23:16 [PATCH -next 0/7] fs/buffer: split pagecache lookups into atomic or blocking Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 1/7] fs/buffer: split locking for pagecache lookups Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:32 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/7] fs/buffer: introduce sleeping flavors " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 3/7] fs/buffer: use sleeping version of __find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 4/7] fs/ocfs2: " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs/jbd2: " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:38 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] fs/ext4: use sleeping version of sb_find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:39 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-15 23:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/migrate: fix sleep in atomic for large folios and buffer heads Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-16 9:43 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-16 19:27 ` [PATCH -next 0/7] fs/buffer: split pagecache lookups into atomic or blocking Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-17 9:57 ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-22 11:25 ` Jan Kara
2025-04-17 9:58 ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-18 1:59 [PATCH v2 " Davidlohr Bueso
2025-04-18 1:59 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs/jbd2: use sleeping version of __find_get_block() Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6tqny4muvkyejvokjkx6gh53ihc2duxleonzwqlkl6hn7y6w7n@r3x6dns3q6pn \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox