From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/madvise: initialize prev pointer in madvise_walk_vmas
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 12:57:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fe09fdd-ff38-42cc-b101-520204213f82@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGsJ_4ySwMuKGYxywY+RH_FkNvjsThhvFQr+d1++KykOqjxarg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2025/6/17 10:24, Barry Song wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 2:05 PM Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>>
>> The prev pointer was uninitialized, which could lead to undefined behavior
>> where its address is taken and passed to the visit() callback without being
>> assigned a value.
>>
>> Initializing it to NULL makes the code safer and prevents potential bugs
>> if a future callback function attempts to read from it.
>
> Is there any read-before-write case here? I haven't found one.
It appears that the following is a call chain showing the read-before-write
of prev:
-> madvise_vma_anon_name(..., struct vm_area_struct **prev, ...)
Receives the address of madvise_walk_vmas's prev.
Passes this pointer directly to madvise_update_vma.
Note that prev is not updated before visit() is called
if !(start > vma->vm_start) in the slow path.
-> madvise_update_vma(..., struct vm_area_struct **prev, ...)
It calls the next function with *prev.
-> vma_modify_flags_name(..., *prev, ...)
Stores the value of madvise_walk_vmas's prev in
vmg.prev
using the VMG_VMA_STATE macro.
-> vma_modify(struct vma_merge_struct *vmg)
Receives the vmg struct.
Passes vmg to vma_merge_existing_range.
-> vma_merge_existing_range(struct
vma_merge_struct *vmg)
Retrieves the value: struct
vm_area_struct *prev = vmg->prev;
The value is now used in a
conditional check:
VM_WARN_ON_VMG(prev && start <=
prev->vm_start, vmg)
If prev was uninitialized, this
would cause a crash.
Thanks,
Lance
>
> It also looks like we're assuming that *prev == NULL implies
> a specific condition:
>
> *prev = NULL; /* tell sys_madvise we drop mmap_lock */
>
> *prev = NULL; /* mmap_lock has been dropped, prev is stale */
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
>> ---
>> mm/madvise.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
>> index 267d8e4adf31..c87325000303 100644
>> --- a/mm/madvise.c
>> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
>> @@ -1536,10 +1536,10 @@ int madvise_walk_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
>> struct vm_area_struct **prev, unsigned long start,
>> unsigned long end, void *arg))
>> {
>> + struct vm_area_struct *prev = NULL;
>> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>> - struct vm_area_struct *prev;
>> - unsigned long tmp;
>> int unmapped_error = 0;
>> + unsigned long tmp;
>> int error;
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 2.49.0
>>
>
> Thanks
> Barry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 4:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-17 2:05 Lance Yang
2025-06-17 2:24 ` Barry Song
2025-06-17 4:57 ` Lance Yang [this message]
2025-06-17 5:19 ` Barry Song
2025-06-17 6:03 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-17 7:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 8:18 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-17 8:21 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 8:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 8:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-17 8:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 8:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-17 9:21 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-17 9:26 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6fe09fdd-ff38-42cc-b101-520204213f82@linux.dev \
--to=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox