From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
To: tkhai@ya.ru
Cc: sultan@kerneltoast.com, dave@stgolabs.net,
penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, paulmck@kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: vmscan: add a map_nr_max field to shrinker_info
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 16:18:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f8f01b5-d802-db64-7725-8481c67c13a2@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230223132725.11685-2-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
On 2023/2/23 21:27, Qi Zheng wrote:
> To prepare for the subsequent lockless memcg slab shrink,
> add a map_nr_max field to struct shrinker_info to records
> its own real shrinker_nr_max.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
I missed Suggested-by here, hi Kirill, can I add it?
Suggested-by: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@ya.ru>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 1 +
> mm/vmscan.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index b6eda2ab205d..aa69ea98e2d8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct shrinker_info {
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> atomic_long_t *nr_deferred;
> unsigned long *map;
> + int map_nr_max;
> };
>
> struct lruvec_stats_percpu {
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 9c1c5e8b24b8..9f895ca6216c 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -224,9 +224,16 @@ static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_protected(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
> }
>
> +static inline bool need_expand(int new_nr_max, int old_nr_max)
> +{
> + return round_up(new_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) >
> + round_up(old_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG);
> +}
> +
> static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> int map_size, int defer_size,
> - int old_map_size, int old_defer_size)
> + int old_map_size, int old_defer_size,
> + int new_nr_max)
> {
> struct shrinker_info *new, *old;
> struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
> @@ -240,12 +247,16 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> if (!old)
> return 0;
>
> + if (!need_expand(new_nr_max, old->map_nr_max))
> + return 0;
> +
> new = kvmalloc_node(sizeof(*new) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
> if (!new)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> new->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)(new + 1);
> new->map = (void *)new->nr_deferred + defer_size;
> + new->map_nr_max = new_nr_max;
>
> /* map: set all old bits, clear all new bits */
> memset(new->map, (int)0xff, old_map_size);
> @@ -295,6 +306,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> }
> info->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)(info + 1);
> info->map = (void *)info->nr_deferred + defer_size;
> + info->map_nr_max = shrinker_nr_max;
> rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, info);
> }
> up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> @@ -302,12 +314,6 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static inline bool need_expand(int nr_max)
> -{
> - return round_up(nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) >
> - round_up(shrinker_nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG);
> -}
> -
> static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -316,7 +322,7 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
> int old_map_size, old_defer_size = 0;
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>
> - if (!need_expand(new_nr_max))
> + if (!need_expand(new_nr_max, shrinker_nr_max))
> goto out;
>
> if (!root_mem_cgroup)
> @@ -332,7 +338,8 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
> memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL);
> do {
> ret = expand_one_shrinker_info(memcg, map_size, defer_size,
> - old_map_size, old_defer_size);
> + old_map_size, old_defer_size,
> + new_nr_max);
> if (ret) {
> mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg);
> goto out;
> @@ -432,7 +439,7 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> for_each_node(nid) {
> child_info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
> parent_info = shrinker_info_protected(parent, nid);
> - for (i = 0; i < shrinker_nr_max; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < child_info->map_nr_max; i++) {
> nr = atomic_long_read(&child_info->nr_deferred[i]);
> atomic_long_add(nr, &parent_info->nr_deferred[i]);
> }
> @@ -899,7 +906,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> if (unlikely(!info))
> goto unlock;
>
> - for_each_set_bit(i, info->map, shrinker_nr_max) {
> + for_each_set_bit(i, info->map, info->map_nr_max) {
> struct shrink_control sc = {
> .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
> .nid = nid,
--
Thanks,
Qi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-25 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-23 13:27 [PATCH v2 0/7] make slab shrink lockless Qi Zheng
2023-02-23 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: vmscan: add a map_nr_max field to shrinker_info Qi Zheng
2023-02-25 8:18 ` Qi Zheng [this message]
2023-02-25 15:14 ` Kirill Tkhai
2023-02-25 15:52 ` Qi Zheng
2023-02-26 13:54 ` Qi Zheng
2023-02-23 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm: vmscan: make global slab shrink lockless Qi Zheng
2023-02-23 15:26 ` Rafael Aquini
2023-02-23 15:37 ` Rafael Aquini
2023-02-24 4:09 ` Qi Zheng
2023-02-23 18:24 ` Sultan Alsawaf
2023-02-23 18:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-23 19:18 ` Sultan Alsawaf
2023-02-24 4:00 ` Qi Zheng
2023-02-24 4:16 ` Qi Zheng
2023-02-24 8:20 ` Sultan Alsawaf
2023-02-24 10:12 ` Qi Zheng
2023-02-24 21:02 ` Kirill Tkhai
2023-02-24 21:14 ` Kirill Tkhai
2023-02-25 8:08 ` Qi Zheng
2023-02-25 15:30 ` Kirill Tkhai
2023-02-25 15:57 ` Qi Zheng
2023-02-25 16:17 ` Kirill Tkhai
2023-02-25 16:37 ` Qi Zheng
2023-02-25 21:28 ` Kirill Tkhai
2023-02-26 13:56 ` Qi Zheng
2023-02-23 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm: vmscan: make memcg " Qi Zheng
2023-02-23 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mm: shrinkers: make count and scan in shrinker debugfs lockless Qi Zheng
2023-02-23 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mm: vmscan: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred Qi Zheng
2023-02-23 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm: vmscan: remove shrinker_rwsem from synchronize_shrinkers() Qi Zheng
2023-02-23 13:27 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm: shrinkers: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex Qi Zheng
2023-02-23 18:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] make slab shrink lockless Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-24 4:08 ` Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f8f01b5-d802-db64-7725-8481c67c13a2@bytedance.com \
--to=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=sultan@kerneltoast.com \
--cc=tkhai@ya.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox