From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
dvyukov@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/stackdepot: use a non-instrumented version of memcmp()
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:08:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f3b8fd2-d2c7-a37d-f79d-510e6cdf2ee9@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171115173445.37236-1-glider@google.com>
On 11/15/2017 08:34 PM, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> stackdepot used to call memcmp(), which compiler tools normally
> instrument, therefore every lookup used to unnecessarily call
> instrumented code.
> This is somewhat ok in the case of KASAN, but under KMSAN a lot of time
> was spent in the instrumentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> ---
> lib/stackdepot.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/stackdepot.c b/lib/stackdepot.c
> index f87d138e9672..d372101e8dc2 100644
> --- a/lib/stackdepot.c
> +++ b/lib/stackdepot.c
> @@ -163,6 +163,23 @@ static inline u32 hash_stack(unsigned long *entries, unsigned int size)
> STACK_HASH_SEED);
> }
>
> +/* Use our own, non-instrumented version of memcmp().
> + *
> + * We actually don't care about the order, just the equality.
> + */
> +static inline
> +int stackdepot_memcmp(const void *s1, const void *s2, unsigned int n)
> +{
Why 'void *' types? The function treats s1, s2 as array of long, also 'n' is number of longs here.
> + unsigned long *u1 = (unsigned long *)s1;
> + unsigned long *u2 = (unsigned long *)s2;
> +
> + for ( ; n-- ; u1++, u2++) {
> + if (*u1 != *u2)
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* Find a stack that is equal to the one stored in entries in the hash */
> static inline struct stack_record *find_stack(struct stack_record *bucket,
> unsigned long *entries, int size,
> @@ -173,10 +190,8 @@ static inline struct stack_record *find_stack(struct stack_record *bucket,
> for (found = bucket; found; found = found->next) {
> if (found->hash == hash &&
> found->size == size &&
> - !memcmp(entries, found->entries,
> - size * sizeof(unsigned long))) {
> + !stackdepot_memcmp(entries, found->entries, size))
> return found;
> - }
> }
> return NULL;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-16 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-15 17:34 Alexander Potapenko
2017-11-16 15:08 ` Andrey Ryabinin [this message]
2017-11-16 16:29 ` Alexander Potapenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f3b8fd2-d2c7-a37d-f79d-510e6cdf2ee9@virtuozzo.com \
--to=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox