linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: hugetlb: Fix huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for non-present ptes
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 12:11:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ebf36f2-2e55-49b2-8764-90fd972d6e66@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250221153156.GC20567@willie-the-truck>

On 21/02/2025 15:31, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:04:15PM +0000, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> arm64 supports multiple huge_pte sizes. Some of the sizes are covered by
>> a single pte entry at a particular level (PMD_SIZE, PUD_SIZE), and some
>> are covered by multiple ptes at a particular level (CONT_PTE_SIZE,
>> CONT_PMD_SIZE). So the function has to figure out the size from the
>> huge_pte pointer. This was previously done by walking the pgtable to
>> determine the level and by using the PTE_CONT bit to determine the
>> number of ptes at the level.
>>
>> But the PTE_CONT bit is only valid when the pte is present. For
>> non-present pte values (e.g. markers, migration entries), the previous
>> implementation was therefore erroniously determining the size. There is
>> at least one known caller in core-mm, move_huge_pte(), which may call
>> huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for a non-present pte. So we must be robust to
>> this case. Additionally the "regular" ptep_get_and_clear() is robust to
>> being called for non-present ptes so it makes sense to follow the
>> behaviour.
>>
>> Fix this by using the new sz parameter which is now provided to the
>> function. Additionally when clearing each pte in a contig range, don't
>> gather the access and dirty bits if the pte is not present.
>>
>> An alternative approach that would not require API changes would be to
>> store the PTE_CONT bit in a spare bit in the swap entry pte for the
>> non-present case. But it felt cleaner to follow other APIs' lead and
>> just pass in the size.
>>
>> As an aside, PTE_CONT is bit 52, which corresponds to bit 40 in the swap
>> entry offset field (layout of non-present pte). Since hugetlb is never
>> swapped to disk, this field will only be populated for markers, which
>> always set this bit to 0 and hwpoison swap entries, which set the offset
>> field to a PFN; So it would only ever be 1 for a 52-bit PVA system where
>> memory in that high half was poisoned (I think!). So in practice, this
>> bit would almost always be zero for non-present ptes and we would only
>> clear the first entry if it was actually a contiguous block. That's
>> probably a less severe symptom than if it was always interpretted as 1
>> and cleared out potentially-present neighboring PTEs.
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Fixes: 66b3923a1a0f ("arm64: hugetlb: add support for PTE contiguous bit")
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> index 06db4649af91..614b2feddba2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> @@ -163,24 +163,23 @@ static pte_t get_clear_contig(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>  			     unsigned long pgsize,
>>  			     unsigned long ncontig)
>>  {
>> -	pte_t orig_pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
>> -	unsigned long i;
>> -
>> -	for (i = 0; i < ncontig; i++, addr += pgsize, ptep++) {
>> -		pte_t pte = __ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
>> -
>> -		/*
>> -		 * If HW_AFDBM is enabled, then the HW could turn on
>> -		 * the dirty or accessed bit for any page in the set,
>> -		 * so check them all.
>> -		 */
>> -		if (pte_dirty(pte))
>> -			orig_pte = pte_mkdirty(orig_pte);
>> -
>> -		if (pte_young(pte))
>> -			orig_pte = pte_mkyoung(orig_pte);
>> +	pte_t pte, tmp_pte;
>> +	bool present;
>> +
>> +	pte = __ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
>> +	present = pte_present(pte);
>> +	while (--ncontig) {
>> +		ptep++;
>> +		addr += pgsize;
>> +		tmp_pte = __ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, ptep);
>> +		if (present) {
>> +			if (pte_dirty(tmp_pte))
>> +				pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
>> +			if (pte_young(tmp_pte))
>> +				pte = pte_mkyoung(pte);
>> +		}
>>  	}
> 
> nit: With the loop now structured like this, we really can't handle
> num_contig_ptes() returning 0 if it gets an unknown size. Granted, that
> really shouldn't happen, but perhaps it would be better to add a 'default'
> case with a WARN() to num_contig_ptes() and then add an early return here?

Looking at other users of num_contig_ptes() it looks like huge_ptep_get()
already assumes at least 1 pte (it calls __ptep_get() before calling
num_contig_ptes()) and set_huge_pte_at() assumes 1 pte for the "present and
non-contig" case. So num_contig_ptes() returning 0 is already not really
consumed consistently.

How about we change the default num_contig_ptes() return value to 1 and add a
warning if size is invalid:

---8<---
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
index 614b2feddba2..b3a7fafe8892 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
@@ -100,20 +100,11 @@ static int find_num_contig(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned
long addr,

 static inline int num_contig_ptes(unsigned long size, size_t *pgsize)
 {
-       int contig_ptes = 0;
+       int contig_ptes = 1;

        *pgsize = size;

        switch (size) {
-#ifndef __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED
-       case PUD_SIZE:
-               if (pud_sect_supported())
-                       contig_ptes = 1;
-               break;
-#endif
-       case PMD_SIZE:
-               contig_ptes = 1;
-               break;
        case CONT_PMD_SIZE:
                *pgsize = PMD_SIZE;
                contig_ptes = CONT_PMDS;
@@ -122,6 +113,8 @@ static inline int num_contig_ptes(unsigned long size, size_t
*pgsize)
                *pgsize = PAGE_SIZE;
                contig_ptes = CONT_PTES;
                break;
+       default:
+               WARN_ON(!__hugetlb_valid_size(size));
        }

        return contig_ptes;
---8<---


> 
> Will



  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-17 14:04 [PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for hugetlb and vmalloc on arm64 Ryan Roberts
2025-02-17 14:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: hugetlb: Add huge page size param to huge_ptep_get_and_clear() Ryan Roberts
2025-02-19  8:28   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-19 19:00   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-20  9:46   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-24 10:49     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-25 14:25   ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-02-25 15:43     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-26  7:16       ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-02-26  7:37   ` Christophe Leroy
2025-02-17 14:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: hugetlb: Fix huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for non-present ptes Ryan Roberts
2025-02-19  8:45   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-19  8:58     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-20  6:37       ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-21  9:55         ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-21 10:26           ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-19 19:03   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-21 15:31   ` Will Deacon
2025-02-24 12:11     ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-02-25 22:18       ` Will Deacon
2025-02-26  8:09         ` Ryan Roberts
2025-02-24 11:27   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2025-02-17 14:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: hugetlb: Fix flush_hugetlb_tlb_range() invalidation level Ryan Roberts
2025-02-19  8:56   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-02-19 19:04   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-17 14:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: Don't skip arch_sync_kernel_mappings() in error paths Ryan Roberts
2025-02-19 19:07   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-02-19 19:10 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Fixes for hugetlb and vmalloc on arm64 Catalin Marinas
2025-02-21 15:35   ` Will Deacon
2025-02-24 12:13     ` Ryan Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6ebf36f2-2e55-49b2-8764-90fd972d6e66@arm.com \
    --to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox