From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kosaki Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: cocci@inria.fr, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy: Fix exception handling in shared_policy_replace()
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 18:30:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e9ca062-939b-af96-c8ff-56ad485d6e79@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9303bdc-b1a7-be5e-56c6-dfa8232b8b55@web.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 18:18:59 +0100
The label “err_out” was used to jump to another pointer check despite of
the detail in the implementation of the function “shared_policy_replace”
that it was determined already that a corresponding variable contained a
null pointer because of a failed call of the function “kmem_cache_alloc”.
1. Use more appropriate labels instead.
2. The implementation of the function “mpol_put” contains a pointer check
for its single input parameter.
Thus delete a redundant check in the caller.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Fixes: 42288fe366c4f1ce7522bc9f27d0bc2a81c55264 ("mm: mempolicy: Convert shared_policy mutex to spinlock")
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index a256a241fd1d..fb0485688dcb 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2736,13 +2736,12 @@ static int shared_policy_replace(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long start,
sp_insert(sp, new);
write_unlock(&sp->lock);
ret = 0;
+put_mpol:
+ mpol_put(mpol_new);
-err_out:
- if (mpol_new)
- mpol_put(mpol_new);
if (n_new)
kmem_cache_free(sn_cache, n_new);
-
+exit:
return ret;
alloc_new:
@@ -2750,10 +2749,10 @@ static int shared_policy_replace(struct shared_policy *sp, unsigned long start,
ret = -ENOMEM;
n_new = kmem_cache_alloc(sn_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!n_new)
- goto err_out;
+ goto exit;
mpol_new = kmem_cache_alloc(policy_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mpol_new)
- goto err_out;
+ goto put_mpol;
atomic_set(&mpol_new->refcnt, 1);
goto restart;
}
--
2.40.0
next parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-23 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <f9303bdc-b1a7-be5e-56c6-dfa8232b8b55@web.de>
2023-03-23 17:30 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2023-03-24 17:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-03-24 18:03 ` Markus Elfring
2023-03-25 18:30 ` [PATCH] selftests: cgroup: Fix exception handling in test_memcg_oom_group_score_events() Markus Elfring
2023-03-25 19:24 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2023-03-26 8:15 ` Markus Elfring
2023-03-26 21:39 ` David Vernet
2023-03-27 5:56 ` Markus Elfring
2023-03-27 9:13 ` David Vernet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e9ca062-939b-af96-c8ff-56ad485d6e79@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox