linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm/compaction: avoid missing last page block in section after skip offline sections
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 20:01:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e76323f-a1cc-7d20-676e-4eccdbcf6b91@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728171037.2219226-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>



On 7/29/2023 1:10 AM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> skip_offline_sections_reverse will return the last pfn in found online
> section. Then we set block_start_pfn to start of page block which
> contains the last pfn in section. Then we continue, move one page
> block forward and ignore the last page block in the online section.
> Make block_start_pfn point to first page block after online section to fix
> this:
> 1. make skip_offline_sections_reverse return end pfn of online section,
> i.e. pfn of page block after online section.
> 2. assign block_start_pfn with next_pfn.
> 
> Fixes: f63224525309 ("mm: compaction: skip the memory hole rapidly when isolating free pages")
> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
> ---
>   mm/compaction.c | 5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 9b7a0a69e19f..ce7841363b12 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static unsigned long skip_offline_sections_reverse(unsigned long start_pfn)
>   
>   	while (start_nr-- > 0) {
>   		if (online_section_nr(start_nr))
> -			return section_nr_to_pfn(start_nr) + PAGES_PER_SECTION - 1;
> +			return section_nr_to_pfn(start_nr + 1);

This is incorrect, you returned the start pfn of this section.

>   	}
>   
>   	return 0;
> @@ -1670,8 +1670,7 @@ static void isolate_freepages(struct compact_control *cc)
>   
>   			next_pfn = skip_offline_sections_reverse(block_start_pfn);
>   			if (next_pfn)
> -				block_start_pfn = max(pageblock_start_pfn(next_pfn),
> -						      low_pfn);
> +				block_start_pfn = max(next_pfn, low_pfn);

'block_start_pfn' should be pageblock aligned. If the 'next_pfn' is not 
pageblock-aligned (though this is not the common case), we should skip it.

But if the 'next_pfn' is pageblock-aligned, yes, the commit f63224525309 
still ignores the last pageblock, which is not right. So I think it 
should be:
block_start_pfn = pageblock_aligned(next_pfn) ? : 
pageblock_start_pfn(next_pfn);
block_start_pfn = max(block_start_pfn, low_pfn);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-31 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-28 17:10 [PATCH 0/8] Fixes and cleanups to compaction Kemeng Shi
     [not found] ` <20230728171037.2219226-8-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
2023-07-28 10:30   ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/compaction: remove unnecessary return for void function David Hildenbrand
2023-08-01  2:53   ` Baolin Wang
     [not found] ` <20230728171037.2219226-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
2023-07-28 10:41   ` [PATCH 1/8] mm/compaction: avoid missing last page block in section after skip offline sections David Hildenbrand
2023-07-29  2:23     ` Kemeng Shi
2023-07-31 12:01   ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2023-08-01  2:18     ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01  2:36       ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01  3:53         ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01  6:08           ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01  8:01             ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01  8:42               ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01  9:32                 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01 12:33                   ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-02  1:11                     ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-02  1:26                       ` Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm/compaction: correct last_migrated_pfn update in compact_zone Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01  2:09   ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01  2:19     ` Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/compaction: remove stale fast_find_block flag in isolate_migratepages Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01  2:42   ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01  3:24     ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01  3:34       ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-01  3:48         ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-01  8:15           ` Baolin Wang
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/compaction: corret comment of cached migrate pfn update Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 10:35   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-01  2:45   ` Baolin Wang
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/compaction: correct comment to complete migration failure Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 17:10 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/compaction: only set skip flag if cc->no_set_skip_hint is false Kemeng Shi
2023-07-28 10:33   ` David Hildenbrand
2023-08-01  3:02   ` Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e76323f-a1cc-7d20-676e-4eccdbcf6b91@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox