From: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>
To: wale zhang <wale.zhang.ftd@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
chrisl@kernel.org, ziy@nvidia.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,
matthew.brost@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/swapops,rmap: remove should-never-be-compiled codes.
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 13:17:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e5c60e7-3a9f-4953-83b6-422ca080ce52@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHrEdetx_AUGa8Qk3JF-tgCZVJsfnfcLLSkkOVc_5ra6K6Q6Kg@mail.gmail.com>
>
> Hello David,
>
> folio_inc_return_large_mapcount and folio_dec_return_large_mapcount
> are only used when CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT is defined.
It's conceptually wrong to leak CONFIG_NO_PAGE_MAPCOUNT in something that is
CONFIG_MM_ID material at this point.
>
>>
>>
>> So if the following makes compilers happy, fine with me:
>
> Apart from the solution as below, I can't think of any other ways. Do
> you have any good ideas?
Leave the code alone.
What we *could* do is
diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h
index daa92a58585d9..ae495c225717a 100644
--- a/include/linux/rmap.h
+++ b/include/linux/rmap.h
@@ -354,11 +354,8 @@ static inline void folio_add_large_mapcount(struct folio *folio,
atomic_add(diff, &folio->_large_mapcount);
}
-static inline int folio_add_return_large_mapcount(struct folio *folio,
- int diff, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
-{
- BUILD_BUG();
-}
+int folio_add_return_large_mapcount(struct folio *folio,
+ int diff, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
static inline void folio_sub_large_mapcount(struct folio *folio,
int diff, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
@@ -366,11 +363,8 @@ static inline void folio_sub_large_mapcount(struct folio *folio,
atomic_sub(diff, &folio->_large_mapcount);
}
-static inline int folio_sub_return_large_mapcount(struct folio *folio,
- int diff, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
-{
- BUILD_BUG();
-}
+int folio_sub_return_large_mapcount(struct folio *folio,
+ int diff, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
#endif /* CONFIG_MM_ID */
#define folio_inc_large_mapcount(folio, vma) \
But then, I have patches here in the works that actually fill these functions
with life.
So leave the code alone; I'm sure that is something with more added value
to be done in the kernel :)
--
Cheers
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-31 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-30 13:01 Wale Zhang
2025-12-30 18:10 ` Andrew Morton
2025-12-30 19:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-30 21:28 ` Barry Song
2025-12-30 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2025-12-30 21:59 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-31 11:58 ` wale zhang
2025-12-31 12:17 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) [this message]
2025-12-31 9:30 ` wale zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e5c60e7-3a9f-4953-83b6-422ca080ce52@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=wale.zhang.ftd@gmail.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox