From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] mm,hwpoison,hugetlb,memory_hotplug: hotremove memory section with hwpoisoned hugepage
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 14:17:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6decf924-1743-d67e-8222-0f02f83b05c1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221025053559.GA2104800@ik1-406-35019.vs.sakura.ne.jp>
On 2022/10/25 13:35, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 10:38:11AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> On 2022/10/24 14:20, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
>>> From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
>>>
>>> HWPoisoned page is not supposed to be accessed once marked, but currently
>>> such accesses can happen during memory hotremove because do_migrate_range()
>>> can be called before dissolve_free_huge_pages() is called.
>>>
>>> Clear HPageMigratable for hwpoisoned hugepages to prevent them from being
>>> migrated. This should be done in hugetlb_lock to avoid race against
>>> isolate_hugetlb().
>>>
>>> get_hwpoison_huge_page() needs to have a flag to show it's called from
>>> unpoison to take refcount of hwpoisoned hugepages, so add it.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>>> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> ChangeLog v3 -> v7:
>>> - introduce TESTCLEARHPAGEFLAG() to determine the value of migratable_cleared
>>
>> Many thanks for update, Naoya. I'm sorry but TestClearHPageMigratable() might be somewhat
>> overkill. As we discussed in previous thread:
>>
>> """
>> I think I might be nitpicking... But it seems ClearHPageMigratable is not enough here.
>> 1. In MF_COUNT_INCREASED case, we don't know whether HPageMigratable is set.
>> 2. Even if HPageMigratable is set, there might be a race window before we clear HPageMigratable?
>> So "*migratable_cleared = TestClearHPageMigratable" might be better? But I might be wrong.
>> """
>>
>> The case 2 should be a dumb problem(sorry about it). HPageMigratable() is always cleared while holding
>> the hugetlb_lock which is already held by get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(). So the only case we should care
>> about is case 1 and that can be handled by below more efficient pattern:
>> if (HPageMigratable)
>> ClearHPageMigratable()
>>
>> So the overhead of test and clear atomic ops can be avoided. But this is trival.
>>
>> Anyway, this patch still looks good to me. And my Reviewed-by tag still applies. Many thanks.
>
> OK, so I replace this 1/4 with the following one, thank you.
Many thanks for your update, Naoya. ;) This version looks good to me too.
Thanks,
Miaohe Lin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-25 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-24 6:20 [PATCH v7 0/4] mm, hwpoison: improve handling workload related to hugetlb and memory_hotplug Naoya Horiguchi
2022-10-24 6:20 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] mm,hwpoison,hugetlb,memory_hotplug: hotremove memory section with hwpoisoned hugepage Naoya Horiguchi
2022-10-25 2:38 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-25 5:35 ` [PATCH v8 " Naoya Horiguchi
2022-10-25 6:17 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-10-24 6:20 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] mm/hwpoison: move definitions of num_poisoned_pages_* to memory-failure.c Naoya Horiguchi
2022-10-24 6:20 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] mm/hwpoison: pass pfn to num_poisoned_pages_*() Naoya Horiguchi
2022-10-24 6:20 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] mm/hwpoison: introduce per-memory_block hwpoison counter Naoya Horiguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6decf924-1743-d67e-8222-0f02f83b05c1@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox