linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>,
	Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] mm/shmem, swap: rework swap entry and index calculation for large swapin
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:36:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d6feb41-5cdd-4591-8e19-d9c247e16fcb@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250710033706.71042-8-ryncsn@gmail.com>



On 2025/7/10 11:37, Kairui Song wrote:
> From: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
> 
> Instead of calculating the swap entry differently in different swapin
> paths, calculate it early before the swap cache lookup and use that
> for the lookup and later swapin. And after swapin have brought a folio,
> simply round it down against the size of the folio.
> 
> This is simple and effective enough to verify the swap value. A folio's
> swap entry is always aligned by its size. Any kind of parallel split or
> race is acceptable because the final shmem_add_to_page_cache ensures
> that all entries covered by the folio are correct, and thus there
> will be no data corruption.
> 
> This also prevents false positive cache lookup. If a shmem read
> request's index points to the middle of a large swap entry,
> previously, shmem will try the swap cache lookup using the large swap
> entry's starting value (which is the first sub swap entry of this
> large entry). This will lead to false positive lookup results if only
> the first few swap entries are cached but the actual requested swap
> entry pointed by the index is uncached. This is not a rare event,
> as swap readahead always tries to cache order 0 folios when possible.
> 
> And this shouldn't cause any increased repeated faults. Instead, no
> matter how the shmem mapping is split in parallel, as long as the
> mapping still contains the right entries, the swapin will succeed.
> 
> The final object size and stack usage are also reduced due to
> simplified code:
> 
> ./scripts/bloat-o-meter mm/shmem.o.old mm/shmem.o
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-233 (-233)
> Function                                     old     new   delta
> shmem_swapin_folio                          4040    3807    -233
> Total: Before=33152, After=32919, chg -0.70%
> 
> Stack usage (Before vs After):
> mm/shmem.c:2277:12:shmem_swapin_folio   264     static
> mm/shmem.c:2277:12:shmem_swapin_folio   256     static
> 
> And while at it, round down the index too if swap entry is round down.
> The index is used either for folio reallocation or confirming the
> mapping content. In either case, it should be aligned with the swap
> folio.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>

Overall, I don't see any obvious issues, but please give me some time to 
run some tests and then get back to you. Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-11  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-10  3:36 [PATCH v5 0/8] mm/shmem, swap: bugfix and improvement of mTHP swap in Kairui Song
2025-07-10  3:36 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] mm/shmem, swap: improve cached mTHP handling and fix potential hung Kairui Song
2025-07-24 17:02   ` Kairui Song
2025-07-24 18:16     ` Kairui Song
2025-07-25  3:52       ` Baolin Wang
2025-07-25  4:54         ` Kairui Song
2025-07-10  3:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] mm/shmem, swap: avoid redundant Xarray lookup during swapin Kairui Song
2025-07-10  3:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] mm/shmem, swap: tidy up THP swapin checks Kairui Song
2025-07-10  3:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] mm/shmem, swap: tidy up swap entry splitting Kairui Song
2025-07-16  7:09   ` Baoquan He
2025-07-10  3:37 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] mm/shmem, swap: never use swap cache and readahead for SWP_SYNCHRONOUS_IO Kairui Song
2025-07-11  6:10   ` Baolin Wang
2025-07-13 10:53   ` Barry Song
2025-07-10  3:37 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] mm/shmem, swap: simplify swapin path and result handling Kairui Song
2025-07-11  6:23   ` Baolin Wang
2025-07-11  6:28     ` Kairui Song
2025-07-15 22:09       ` Hugh Dickins
2025-07-16  7:14         ` Kairui Song
2025-07-10  3:37 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] mm/shmem, swap: rework swap entry and index calculation for large swapin Kairui Song
2025-07-11  6:36   ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2025-07-14  2:39     ` Baolin Wang
2025-07-10  3:37 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] mm/shmem, swap: fix major fault counting Kairui Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6d6feb41-5cdd-4591-8e19-d9c247e16fcb@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
    --cc=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox