linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	mjguzik@gmail.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, willy@infradead.org, raghavendra.kt@amd.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/7] treewide: provide a generic clear_user_page() variant
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 08:39:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d2605e8-409d-4b4a-9729-599dd2526b74@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tsyf58ro.fsf@oracle.com>

Hi Ankur,

Le 28/11/2025 à 00:57, Ankur Arora a écrit :
> 
> Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> writes:
> 
> 
> How about something like this for clear_user_page() (though maybe I
> should be always defining clear_user_page() and not conditioning it on
> the existence of the generic clear_user_highpage()):
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/highmem.h b/include/linux/highmem.h
> index abc20f9810fd..ca9d28aa29b2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/highmem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/highmem.h
> @@ -197,6 +197,22 @@ static inline void invalidate_kernel_vmap_range(void *vaddr, int size)
>   }
>   #endif
> 
> +#if !defined(clear_user_page) && !defined(clear_user_highpage)
> +/**
> + * clear_user_page() - clear a page to be mapped to user space
> + * @addr: the address of the page
> + * @vaddr: the address of the user mapping
> + * @page: the page
> + *
> + * The sole user of clear_user_page() is clear_user_highpage().
> + * Define it if the arch does not and only if needed.
> + */
> +static inline void clear_user_page(void *addr, unsigned long vaddr, struct page *page)
> +{
> +       clear_page(addr);
> +}
> +#endif

WOuld be more obvious if you enclose that inside the same #ifdef as 
clear_user_highpage(), something like:

#ifndef clear_user_highpage

#ifndef clear_user_page
static inline void clear_user_page(void *addr, unsigned long vaddr, 
struct page *page)
{
	clear_page(addr);
}
#endif

static inline void clear_user_highpage(struct page *page, unsigned long 
vaddr)
{
	void *addr = kmap_local_page(page);
	clear_user_page(addr, vaddr, page);
	kunmap_local(addr);
}
#endif

> +
>   /* when CONFIG_HIGHMEM is not set these will be plain clear/copy_page */
>   #ifndef clear_user_highpage
>   static inline void clear_user_highpage(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr)
> 
> And for clear_user_pages():
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/highmem.h b/include/linux/highmem.h
> index ca9d28aa29b2..b9b3cc76a91a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/highmem.h
> +++ b/include/linux/highmem.h
> @@ -223,6 +223,35 @@ static inline void clear_user_highpage(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr)
>   }
>   #endif
> 
> +/**
> + * clear_user_pages() - clear a page range to be mapped to user space
> + * @addr: start address
> + * @vaddr: start address of the user mapping
> + * @page: start page
> + * @npages: number of pages
> + *
> + * Assumes that the region (@addr, +@npages) has been validated
> + * already so this does no exception handling.
> + */
> +static inline void clear_user_pages(void *addr, unsigned long vaddr,
> +               struct page *page, unsigned int npages)
> +{
> +#ifdef clear_user_page
> +       do {
> +               clear_user_page(addr, vaddr, page);
> +               addr += PAGE_SIZE;
> +               vaddr += PAGE_SIZE;
> +               page++;
> +       } while (--npages);
> +#else
> +       /*
> +        * Prefer clear_pages() to allow for architectural optimizations
> +        * when operations on contiguous page ranges.
> +        */
> +       clear_pages(addr, npages);
> +#endif
> +}

Not sure to understand the logic. You say this is not expected to be 
overriden by architectures in the near future, then why do we need that 
? Can't we do everything inside clear_user_highpages() for clarity ?

At the time being clear_user_page() is used exclusively by 
clear_user_highpage() so I expect clear_user_page() to only exist when 
CONFIG_HIGHMEM is enabled. And in that case clear_user_highpages() 
doesn't call clear_user_pages() so at the end only the else part 
remains, which is a simple call to clear_pages(). Why not just call 
clear_pages() directly from clear_user_highpages() and drop 
clear_user_pages() ?

Christophe



  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-28  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-21 20:23 [PATCH v9 0/7] mm: folio_zero_user: clear contiguous pages Ankur Arora
2025-11-21 20:23 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] treewide: provide a generic clear_user_page() variant Ankur Arora
2025-11-23 11:53   ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2025-11-24 10:17     ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-24 14:02       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-25  7:52       ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-27 23:57         ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-28  7:39           ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) [this message]
2025-11-28 22:19             ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-21 20:23 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] mm: introduce clear_pages() and clear_user_pages() Ankur Arora
2025-11-23 13:17   ` Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)
2025-11-24 10:26     ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-28 10:13       ` Lance Yang
2025-11-28 21:59         ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-21 20:23 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] mm/highmem: introduce clear_user_highpages() Ankur Arora
2025-11-21 20:23 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] x86/mm: Simplify clear_page_* Ankur Arora
2025-11-25 13:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2025-11-25 19:01     ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-26 10:01   ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-11-27  5:28     ` Ankur Arora
2025-11-21 20:23 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] x86/clear_page: Introduce clear_pages() Ankur Arora
2025-11-21 20:23 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] mm, folio_zero_user: support clearing page ranges Ankur Arora
2025-11-21 20:23 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] mm: folio_zero_user: cache neighbouring pages Ankur Arora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6d2605e8-409d-4b4a-9729-599dd2526b74@kernel.org \
    --to=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox