From: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, dgc@sgi.com, Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/12] Slab defragmentation V3
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 23:17:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0706081417v6b66f753k1d965fb6f82674e9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706081345520.2447@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On 08/06/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>
> > > Could you remove the trylock patch and see how this one fares? We may need
> > > both but this should avoid taking the slub_lock around any possible alloc of
> > > sysfs.
> > It's a bit tricky
>
> Hmmm... Yes that version was aginst 4-mm1 instead after the defrag
> patchset. The difference is only the "ops" parameter...
>
I did notice it when I applied patch by hand.
Unfortunately the patch doesn't fix the problem.
Regards,
Michal
--
"Najbardziej brakowało mi twojego milczenia."
-- Andrzej Sapkowski "Coś więcej"
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-08 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-07 21:55 clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 01/12] SLUB: Add support for kmem_cache_ops clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 02/12] SLUB: Slab defragmentation core functionality clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 03/12] SLUB: Extend slabinfo to support -D and -C options clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 04/12] SLUB: Slab defragmentation trigger clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 05/12] Generic inode defragmentation clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 06/12] ext2 ext3 ext4: support inode slab defragmentation clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 07/12] xfs: inode defragmentation support clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 08/12] procfs: " clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 09/12] reiserfs: " clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 10/12] sockets: " clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 11/12] Dentry defragmentation clameter
2007-06-07 21:55 ` [patch 12/12] SLUB: Support memory defrag through kmem_cache_vacate() clameter
2007-06-08 9:39 ` [patch 00/12] Slab defragmentation V3 Michal Piotrowski
2007-06-08 15:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08 15:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08 15:45 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-06-08 18:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-06-08 18:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08 18:56 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-06-08 19:08 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08 19:32 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-06-08 19:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08 19:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08 19:47 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-06-08 20:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-06-08 21:17 ` Michal Piotrowski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6bffcb0e0706081417v6b66f753k1d965fb6f82674e9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@skynet.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox