From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1114AC433E2 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:00:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C3421974 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="oBvuEWmS" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 57C3421974 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8C99B90006A; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:00:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 85264900069; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:00:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 6FFA290006A; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:00:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0159.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.159]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500D4900069 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 13:00:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF720180AD830 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:00:38 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77265909756.11.use10_22058b627112 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE90180F8B9D for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:00:35 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: use10_22058b627112 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2314 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:00:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=+jWJSJfIQz6E28jxk5SjJ1O4Do640g9wF9++nJ8QJbg=; b=oBvuEWmSMaP//CD+lK6BSucaOk X5NA+PnSUua3gdMPV+nLEjGcUObTtayoysR+P7fS1oKAMfYgx4S4o8vKH6kVXO8f8hP9xH16mdoj3 94IiRKRC7ym6tbSK9OjCL9UO7g3XXTcersFR1fHZuupjM3zcIylxNoMUqQeSy+WLq0xQ/jDjSrVOQ PZ7tGuRdtjG99mqE7Nqx6wPOTLglGArwMCqQQrqA+2/BAMMoP6u5ymytCMdXtf4XILlX82m3dtl0x cKUpKzGtBCyhNmrsem6v77I5ZQeXBaNI8DE6Fo8mNSu3NdWLKISuUlbt6qGIE2hzCKRSbrKMnNuYu 3eQrA3QA==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0::19c2] by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kIEJi-0007bp-Pq; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:00:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [BUG] slab: double free detected in cache 'kmalloc-128', objp daff5780 To: Peter Geis , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org References: From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <6be9a256-697d-b991-294e-95282a53f10a@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:00:26 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EFE90180F8B9D X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 9/15/20 4:41 AM, Peter Geis wrote: > [33633.566567] [] (unwind_backtrace) from [] > (show_stack+0x10/0x14) Hi Peter, In the future, could you prevent long lines from being line-wrapped? E.g., the 2 lines above should all be on one line. It is much harder to read as it was posted. thanks. -- ~Randy