From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Rebecca Mckeever <remckee0@gmail.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:43:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bd3d2df-8a21-40df-08c3-e9eaaa5000fe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1666203642.git.remckee0@gmail.com>
On 19.10.22 20:34, Rebecca Mckeever wrote:
> These patches add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(). There are two
> sets of tests: range tests and NUMA tests. The range tests use a normal
> (i.e., UMA) simulated physical memory and set the nid to NUMA_NO_NODE. The
> NUMA tests use a simulated physical memory that is set up with multiple
> NUMA nodes. Additionally, most of the NUMA tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE.
>
> For the range tests, the TEST_F_EXACT flag is used to run the same set of
> range tests used for memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(). The NUMA tests have the
> same setup as the corresponding test for memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(), but
> several of the memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() tests fail to allocate
> memory in setups where the memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() test would
> allocate memory. Also, some memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() tests drop the
> lower limit of the requested range in order to allocate within the
> requested node, but the same setup in a memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() test
> allocates within the requested range.
Thanks a lot Rebecca for moving forward with these changes even after
your Outreachy internship ended!
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-31 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 18:34 Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] memblock tests: introduce range " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 10:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-11-03 4:02 ` Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] memblock tests: add top-down NUMA " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 10:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] memblock tests: add bottom-up " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 10:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] memblock tests: add generic " Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 12:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-19 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] memblock tests: remove completed TODO item Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 5:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] memblock tests: add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw Rebecca Mckeever
2022-10-31 8:43 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-10-31 12:43 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6bd3d2df-8a21-40df-08c3-e9eaaa5000fe@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=remckee0@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox