From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, mhocko@suse.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com, mike.kravetz@oracle.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, will.deacon@arm.com, steve.capper@arm.com,
kaly.xin@arm.com, nd@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mm: fix the "counter.sh" failure for libhugetlbfs
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:20:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b83ea5d-a465-7582-a215-51a21fb4ce2e@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479107259-2011-1-git-send-email-shijie.huang@arm.com>
On 11/14/2016 08:07 AM, Huang Shijie wrote:
> (1) Background
> For the arm64, the hugetlb page size can be 32M (PMD + Contiguous bit).
> In the 4K page environment, the max page order is 10 (max_order - 1),
> so 32M page is the gigantic page.
>
> The arm64 MMU supports a Contiguous bit which is a hint that the TTE
> is one of a set of contiguous entries which can be cached in a single
> TLB entry. Please refer to the arm64v8 mannul :
> DDI0487A_f_armv8_arm.pdf (in page D4-1811)
>
> (2) The bug
> After I tested the libhugetlbfs, I found the test case "counter.sh"
> will fail with the gigantic page (32M page in arm64 board).
>
> This patch set adds support for gigantic surplus hugetlb pages,
> allowing the counter.sh unit test to pass.
>
> v1 -- > v2:
> 1.) fix the compiler error in X86.
> 2.) add new patches for NUMA.
> The patch #2 ~ #5 are new patches.
>
> Huang Shijie (6):
> mm: hugetlb: rename some allocation functions
> mm: hugetlb: add a new parameter for some functions
> mm: hugetlb: change the return type for alloc_fresh_gigantic_page
> mm: mempolicy: intruduce a helper huge_nodemask()
> mm: hugetlb: add a new function to allocate a new gigantic page
> mm: hugetlb: support gigantic surplus pages
>
> include/linux/mempolicy.h | 8 +++
> mm/hugetlb.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> mm/mempolicy.c | 20 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Can't say I'm entirely happy with the continued direction of maze of
functions for huge page allocation :( Feels like path of least
resistance to basically copy/paste the missing parts here. Is there no
way to consolidate the code more?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-28 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-14 7:07 Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] mm: hugetlb: rename some allocation functions Huang Shijie
2016-11-28 13:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-29 8:53 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-29 10:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-30 3:03 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm: hugetlb: add a new parameter for some functions Huang Shijie
2016-12-02 13:52 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 3:05 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mm: hugetlb: change the return type for alloc_fresh_gigantic_page Huang Shijie
2016-12-02 13:56 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 3:06 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] mm: mempolicy: intruduce a helper huge_nodemask() Huang Shijie
2016-11-15 6:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-11-15 8:20 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-15 8:52 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-16 6:53 ` [PATCH V2 fix " Huang Shijie
2016-12-02 13:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 3:09 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] mm: hugetlb: add a new function to allocate a new gigantic page Huang Shijie
2016-11-16 6:55 ` [PATCH V2 fix " Huang Shijie
2016-11-28 14:17 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-29 9:03 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-29 10:50 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-11-30 3:02 ` Huang Shijie
2016-12-02 14:03 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 3:15 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 7:07 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] mm: hugetlb: support gigantic surplus pages Huang Shijie
2016-11-14 22:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] mm: fix the "counter.sh" failure for libhugetlbfs Andrew Morton
2016-11-15 2:36 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-28 14:20 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2016-11-29 9:07 ` Huang Shijie
2016-11-30 6:30 ` [PATCH extra ] mm: hugetlb: add description for alloc_gigantic_page() Huang Shijie
2016-12-02 14:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] mm: fix the "counter.sh" failure for libhugetlbfs Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b83ea5d-a465-7582-a215-51a21fb4ce2e@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kaly.xin@arm.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=shijie.huang@arm.com \
--cc=steve.capper@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox