From: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>, Guohanjun <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v4 0/7]arm64: add machine check safe support
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 17:09:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b18fed1-f802-b15c-95d9-718a48edbbfc@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220420030418.3189040-1-tongtiangen@huawei.com>
Hi Mark, James, Robin, kindly ping...
Thanks.
在 2022/4/20 11:04, Tong Tiangen 写道:
> With the increase of memory capacity and density, the probability of
> memory error increases. The increasing size and density of server RAM
> in the data center and cloud have shown increased uncorrectable memory
> errors.
>
> Currently, the kernel has a mechanism to recover from hardware memory
> errors. This patchset provides an new recovery mechanism.
>
> For arm64, the hardware memory error handling is do_sea() which divided
> into two cases:
> 1. The user state consumed the memory errors, the solution is kill the
> user process and isolate the error page.
> 2. The kernel state consumed the memory errors, the solution is panic.
>
> For case 2, Undifferentiated panic maybe not the optimal choice, it can be
> handled better, in some scenes, we can avoid panic, such as uaccess, if the
> uaccess fails due to memory error, only the user process will be affected,
> kill the user process and isolate the user page with hardware memory errors
> is a better choice.
>
> This patchset can be divided into three parts:
> 1. Patch 0/1/4 - make some minor fixes to the associated code.
> 2. Patch 3 - arm64 add support for machine check safe framework.
> 3. Pathc 5/6/7 - arm64 add uaccess and cow to machine check safe.
>
> Since V4:
> 1. According to Robin's suggestion, direct modify user_ldst and
> user_ldp in asm-uaccess.h and modify mte.S.
> 2. Add new macro USER_MC in asm-uaccess.h, used in copy_from_user.S
> and copy_to_user.S.
> 3. According to Robin's suggestion, using micro in copy_page_mc.S to
> simplify code.
> 4. According to KeFeng's suggestion, modify powerpc code in patch1.
> 5. According to KeFeng's suggestion, modify mm/extable.c and some code
> optimization.
>
> Since V3:
> 1. According to Mark's suggestion, all uaccess can be recovered due to
> memory error.
> 2. Scenario pagecache reading is also supported as part of uaccess
> (copy_to_user()) and duplication code problem is also solved.
> Thanks for Robin's suggestion.
> 3. According Mark's suggestion, update commit message of patch 2/5.
> 4. According Borisllav's suggestion, update commit message of patch 1/5.
>
> Since V2:
> 1.Consistent with PPC/x86, Using CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_COPY_MC instead of
> ARM64_UCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY.
> 2.Add two new scenes, cow and pagecache reading.
> 3.Fix two small bug(the first two patch).
>
> V1 in here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220323033705.3966643-1-tongtiangen@huawei.com/
>
> Robin Murphy (1):
> arm64: mte: Clean up user tag accessors
>
> Tong Tiangen (6):
> x86, powerpc: fix function define in copy_mc_to_user
> arm64: fix types in copy_highpage()
> arm64: add support for machine check error safe
> arm64: add copy_{to, from}_user to machine check safe
> arm64: add {get, put}_user to machine check safe
> arm64: add cow to machine check safe
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-extable.h | 33 +++++++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-uaccess.h | 15 +++--
> arch/arm64/include/asm/extable.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/page.h | 10 ++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 4 +-
> arch/arm64/lib/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S | 18 +++---
> arch/arm64/lib/copy_page_mc.S | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S | 18 +++---
> arch/arm64/lib/mte.S | 4 +-
> arch/arm64/mm/copypage.c | 36 ++++++++++--
> arch/arm64/mm/extable.c | 33 +++++++++++
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 27 ++++++++-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 1 +
> include/linux/highmem.h | 8 +++
> include/linux/uaccess.h | 9 +++
> mm/memory.c | 2 +-
> 19 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/lib/copy_page_mc.S
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 3:04 Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 1/7] x86, powerpc: fix function define in copy_mc_to_user Tong Tiangen
2022-04-22 9:45 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-24 1:16 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-02 14:24 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-05-03 1:06 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-05 1:21 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 2/7] arm64: fix types in copy_highpage() Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 3/7] arm64: add support for machine check error safe Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:26 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19 6:29 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-25 8:30 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26 3:36 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-26 9:50 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-27 1:40 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 4/7] arm64: add copy_{to, from}_user to machine check safe Tong Tiangen
2022-05-04 10:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-05 6:39 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-05 13:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-05 14:33 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:31 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19 6:53 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 5/7] arm64: mte: Clean up user tag accessors Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:36 ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 6/7] arm64: add {get, put}_user to machine check safe Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19 7:09 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-20 3:04 ` [PATCH -next v4 7/7] arm64: add cow " Tong Tiangen
2022-05-13 15:44 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-19 10:38 ` Tong Tiangen
2022-04-27 9:09 ` Tong Tiangen [this message]
2022-05-04 19:58 ` (subset) [PATCH -next v4 0/7]arm64: add machine check safe support Catalin Marinas
2022-05-16 18:45 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b18fed1-f802-b15c-95d9-718a48edbbfc@huawei.com \
--to=tongtiangen@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox