linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	jannh@google.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, peterx@redhat.com,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, baohua@kernel.org,
	kevin.brodsky@arm.com, quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com,
	christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, hughd@google.com,
	yang@os.amperecomputing.com, ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:03:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ac365cf-da48-4791-b56d-62335519efdf@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429052336.18912-1-dev.jain@arm.com>

-cc namit@vmware.com

Also,

On future respins can we please drop Namit from vmware from cc list?

I am being spammed with these messages whenever I reply here:

'A custom mail flow rule created by an admin at onevmw.onmicrosoft.com has
blocked your message.  Recipient is not authorized to accept external mail'

Or ask him to fix this :)

Cheers, Lorenzo

On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 10:53:29AM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> This patchset optimizes the mprotect() system call for large folios
> by PTE-batching.
>
> We use the following test cases to measure performance, mprotect()'ing
> the mapped memory to read-only then read-write 40 times:
>
> Test case 1: Mapping 1G of memory, touching it to get PMD-THPs, then
> pte-mapping those THPs
> Test case 2: Mapping 1G of memory with 64K mTHPs
> Test case 3: Mapping 1G of memory with 4K pages
>
> Average execution time on arm64, Apple M3:
> Before the patchset:
> T1: 7.9 seconds   T2: 7.9 seconds   T3: 4.2 seconds
>
> After the patchset:
> T1: 2.1 seconds   T2: 2.2 seconds   T3: 4.2 seconds
>
> Observing T1/T2 and T3 before the patchset, we also remove the regression
> introduced by ptep_get() on a contpte block. And, for large folios we get
> an almost 74% performance improvement.
>
> v1->v2:
>  - Rebase onto mm-unstable (6ebffe676fcf: util_macros.h: make the header more resilient)
>  - Abridge the anon-exclusive condition (Lance Yang)
>
> Dev Jain (7):
>   mm: Refactor code in mprotect
>   mm: Optimize mprotect() by batch-skipping PTEs
>   mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit
>   arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start
>   arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_commit
>   mm: Batch around can_change_pte_writable()
>   mm: Optimize mprotect() through PTE-batching
>
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h |  10 ++
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c              |  21 +++-
>  include/linux/mm.h               |   4 +-
>  include/linux/pgtable.h          |  42 ++++++++
>  mm/gup.c                         |   2 +-
>  mm/huge_memory.c                 |   4 +-
>  mm/memory.c                      |   6 +-
>  mm/mprotect.c                    | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  mm/pgtable-generic.c             |  16 ++-
>  9 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-04-29 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-29  5:23 Dev Jain
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: Refactor code in mprotect Dev Jain
2025-04-29  6:41   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29  6:54     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 11:00   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() by batch-skipping PTEs Dev Jain
2025-04-29  7:14   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29  8:59     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 13:19   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30  6:37     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 13:18       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-30 13:36         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-04-29  8:39   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29  9:01     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 13:52   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30  6:25     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 14:37       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-06 14:30         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-06 15:03           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 14:09     ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-30 14:34       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-01 11:33         ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-01 12:58           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-06 14:28             ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30  5:35   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-30  5:45   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-30 14:16   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start Dev Jain
2025-04-30  5:43   ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-30  5:49     ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30  6:14       ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-30  6:32         ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_commit Dev Jain
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm: Batch around can_change_pte_writable() Dev Jain
2025-04-29  9:15   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29  9:19   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29  9:27     ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29 13:57       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 14:00         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30  5:44         ` Dev Jain
2025-05-06  9:16       ` Dev Jain
2025-05-06 14:34         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30  6:17   ` kernel test robot
2025-04-29  5:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() through PTE-batching Dev Jain
2025-04-29  7:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios Lance Yang
2025-04-29  9:02   ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 10:41     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30  5:42       ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30  6:22         ` Lance Yang
2025-04-30  7:07           ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 11:03 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-04-29 14:02   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6ac365cf-da48-4791-b56d-62335519efdf@lucifer.local \
    --to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox