From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug.c: don't fail hot unplug quite so eagerly
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 19:22:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a5cd655-f3e6-49ef-e359-401ba84fca25@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83689f25-ca50-7ece-45f0-a936e704df7d@redhat.com>
On 6/21/23 01:11, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> ...what about discerning between "user initiated offline_pages" and
>> "offline pages as part of a driver shutdown/unload"?
>
> Makes sense to me.
>
> There are two ways for triggering it directly from user space:
>
> 1) drivers/base/core.c:online_store()
> 2) drivers/base/memory.c:state_store()
>
> We cannot easily hook into 2) to indicate "we're offlining directly
> from user space". SO we might have to do it the other way around.
>
>
> Something along the following lines should do the trick (expect whitespace damage):
>
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 53ee7654f009..acd4b739505a 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -152,6 +152,13 @@ void put_online_mems(void)
>
> bool movable_node_enabled = false;
>
> +/*
> + * Protected by the device hotplug lock. Indicates whether device offlining
> + * is triggered from try_offline_memory_block() such that we don't fail memory
> + * offlining if a signal is pending.
> + */
> +static bool mhp_in_try_offline_memory_block;
> +
> #ifndef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_DEFAULT_ONLINE
> int mhp_default_online_type = MMOP_OFFLINE;
> #else
> @@ -1860,7 +1867,8 @@ int __ref offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> do {
> pfn = start_pfn;
> do {
> - if (signal_pending(current)) {
> + if (!mhp_in_try_offline_memory_block &&
> + signal_pending(current)) {
> ret = -EINTR;
> reason = "signal backoff";
> goto failed_removal_isolated;
> @@ -2177,7 +2185,9 @@ static int try_offline_memory_block(struct memory_block *mem, void *arg)
> if (page && zone_idx(page_zone(page)) == ZONE_MOVABLE)
> online_type = MMOP_ONLINE_MOVABLE;
>
> + mhp_in_try_offline_memory_block = true;
> rc = device_offline(&mem->dev);
> + mhp_in_try_offline_memory_block = false;
> /*
> * Default is MMOP_OFFLINE - change it only if offlining succeeded,
> * so try_reonline_memory_block() can do the right thing.
>
>
>
> There is still arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c that calls
> device_offline() and would fail on signals (not sure if relevant, like for virtio-mem it
> shouldn't be that relevant).
>
> I guess dlpar_remove_lmb() can now simply call offline_and_remove_memory().
> [I might craft a patch later]
>
This direction looks good to me, I'd love to see a patch if you
put something together.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-22 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-20 1:17 John Hubbard
2023-06-20 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] A minor flurry of selftest/mm fixes John Hubbard
2023-06-20 1:19 ` Please disregard all of the selftest patches " John Hubbard
2023-06-20 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] selftests/mm: fix uffd-stress unused function warning John Hubbard
2023-06-20 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] selftests/mm: fix unused variable warnings in hugetlb-madvise.c, migration.c John Hubbard
2023-06-20 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] selftests/mm: fix "warning: expression which evaluates to zero..." in mlock2-tests.c John Hubbard
2023-06-20 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] selftests/mm: fix invocation of tests that are run via shell scripts John Hubbard
2023-06-20 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] selftests/mm: fix two -Wformat-security warnings in uffd builds John Hubbard
2023-06-20 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] selftests/mm: fix a "possibly uninitialized" warning in pkey-x86.h John Hubbard
2023-06-20 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] selftests/mm: fix uffd-unit-tests.c build failure due to missing MADV_COLLAPSE John Hubbard
2023-06-20 10:17 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-06-20 10:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-20 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] selftests/mm: move uffd* routines from vm_util.c to uffd-common.c John Hubbard
2023-06-20 7:12 ` [PATCH] mm/memory_hotplug.c: don't fail hot unplug quite so eagerly David Hildenbrand
2023-06-20 21:54 ` John Hubbard
2023-06-21 8:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-21 8:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-06-22 2:22 ` John Hubbard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a5cd655-f3e6-49ef-e359-401ba84fca25@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox