Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] selftests/mm: soft-dirty should fail if a testcase fails

[Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>]

On 22/04/2024 10:33, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.04.24 09:43, Ryan Roberts wrote:
>> Previously soft-dirty was unconditionally exiting with success, even if
>> one of it's testcases failed. Let's fix that so that failure can be
>> reported to automated systems properly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c
>> index 7dbfa53d93a0..bdfa5d085f00 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/soft-dirty.c
>> @@ -209,5 +209,5 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>
>>       close(pagemap_fd);
>>
>> -    return ksft_exit_pass();
>> +    ksft_finished();
>>   }
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>
> 
> Guess that makes sense independent of all the other stuff?

Yes definitely. What's the process here? Do I need to re-post as a stand-alone
patch? Or perhaps, Shuah, you could take this into your tree as is?

> 
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

Thanks!