linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: maobibo <maobibo@loongson.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/khugepaged: sched to numa node when collapse huge page
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 09:29:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69c4f018-2012-8af5-569b-289d2a8a80f5@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c1fc6d4-7d3a-85dd-ebd9-fc8e221f1878@loongson.cn>



在 2022/5/13 09:19, maobibo 写道:
> 
> 
> 在 2022/5/13 08:36, Andrew Morton 写道:
>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:34:07 -0400 Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 05:17:07PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> On 17.03.22 07:50, Bibo Mao wrote:
>>>>> collapse huge page will copy huge page from general small pages,
>>>>> dest node is calculated from most one of source pages, however
>>>>> THP daemon is not scheduled on dest node. The performance may be
>>>>> poor since huge page copying across nodes, also cache is not used
>>>>> for target node. With this patch, khugepaged daemon switches to
>>>>> the same numa node with huge page. It saves copying time and makes
>>>>> use of local cache better.
>>>>>
>>>>> With this patch, specint 2006 base performance is improved with 6%
>>>>> on Loongson 3C5000L platform with 32 cores and 8 numa nodes.
>>>>
>>>> If it helps, that's nice as long as it doesn't hurt other cases.
>>>>
>>
>> Quite a bit of doubtful feedback and we have yet to hear from the
>> author.  I'll drop the patch.
>>
>> Bibo, please resend at a later time if you feel the patch remains
>> desirable.  Please attempt to address the feedback via code changes
>> and/or changelogging.
> Sorry for the late response, the mail is filtered and I did not notice that. The result is not so obvious after bandwidth is improved between nodes, it is only about 1% improvement for specint2006 for 32 core on my box.
> 
> Now I do not see negative effective about this patch unless user wants to keep some cores separated from khugepaged daemon process.

Can we provide an extra parameter to let khugepaged daemon scheduling binded to node or freely? If can, I will provide updated patch.

> 
> 
> regards
> bibo,mao



  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-13  1:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-17  6:50 Bibo Mao
2022-04-27 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2022-04-27 22:29   ` Yang Shi
2022-04-28 10:07   ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-28 13:50 ` Peter Xu
2022-04-28 15:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-28 16:34   ` Peter Xu
2022-05-13  0:36     ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-13  1:19       ` maobibo
2022-05-13  1:29         ` maobibo [this message]
2022-05-13  1:49           ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-13  1:59             ` maobibo
2022-05-13  2:40             ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69c4f018-2012-8af5-569b-289d2a8a80f5@loongson.cn \
    --to=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox