From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-f197.google.com (mail-qt0-f197.google.com [209.85.216.197]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1AE76B0038 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:06:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qt0-f197.google.com with SMTP id q3so99387937qtf.4 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:06:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur01on0090.outbound.protection.outlook.com. [104.47.1.90]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e8si10021602pgp.204.2017.02.13.05.06.44 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:06:44 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/5] x86/mm: introduce mmap{,_legacy}_base References: <20170130120432.6716-1-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> <20170130120432.6716-3-dsafonov@virtuozzo.com> From: Dmitry Safonov Message-ID: <696975bb-8846-24b8-e166-b2569d49cec8@virtuozzo.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:02:57 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 0x7f454c46@gmail.com, Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On 02/11/2017 05:13 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > >> In the following patch they will be used to compute: >> - mmap{,_legacy}_base for 64-bit mmap() >> - mmap_compat{,_legacy}_base for 32-bit mmap() >> >> This patch makes it possible to calculate mmap bases for any specified >> task_size, which is needed to correctly choose the base address for mmap >> in 32-bit syscalls and 64-bit syscalls. > > Please rework your changelogs so they follow the requirements in > Documentation.... Look for 'this patch' there. Sure, I'll rewrite the changelogs. > > Also order it in a way which makes it clear what the problem is and how > it's solved. > >> +#define STACK_RND_MASK_MODE(native) (0x7ff) >> #define STACK_RND_MASK (0x7ff) >> >> #define ARCH_DLINFO ARCH_DLINFO_IA32 >> @@ -295,7 +296,8 @@ do { \ >> #else /* CONFIG_X86_32 */ >> >> /* 1GB for 64bit, 8MB for 32bit */ >> -#define STACK_RND_MASK (test_thread_flag(TIF_ADDR32) ? 0x7ff : 0x3fffff) >> +#define STACK_RND_MASK_MODE(native) ((native) ? 0x3fffff : 0x7ff) >> +#define STACK_RND_MASK STACK_RND_MASK_MODE(!test_thread_flag(TIF_ADDR32)) > > I had to look twice what MODE means. The macro name suggests that it > returns the mode, while it actually returns the mask. That's confusing at > best. And 'native' is not intuitive either. > > #define __STACK_RND_MASK(is64bit) ((is64bit) ? 0x3fffff : 0x7ff) > #define STACK_RND_MASK __STACK_RND_MASK(!mmap_is_ia32()) > > That is pretty much clear and it uses mmap_is_ia32() as we do in other > places. As a consequemce you can use the same macros for 64 and 32 bit. Thanks, that's more readable. I was tempting to name it more self-descriptive, but two underscores looks enough. I'll resend with `is32bit' parameter - this way I'll also get rid of negaion in a call. I'll also need to move it down in header to omit forward-declaration of mmap_is_ia32(). > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h >> index 1be64da0384e..52086e65b422 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h >> @@ -862,7 +862,8 @@ extern void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long new_ip, >> * This decides where the kernel will search for a free chunk of vm >> * space during mmap's. >> */ >> -#define TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE (PAGE_ALIGN(TASK_SIZE / 3)) >> +#define _TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE(task_size) (PAGE_ALIGN(task_size / 3)) >> +#define TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE _TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE(TASK_SIZE) > > Please use two underscores and align the macros in tabular fashion. > > #define __TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE(task_size) (PAGE_ALIGN(task_size / 3)) > #define TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE __TASK_UNMAPPED_BASE(TASK_SIZE) > > That way stuff becomes easy to read. Ok > >> #define KSTK_EIP(task) (task_pt_regs(task)->ip) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c >> index 42063e787717..98be520fd270 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c >> @@ -35,12 +35,14 @@ struct va_alignment __read_mostly va_align = { >> .flags = -1, >> }; >> >> -static unsigned long stack_maxrandom_size(void) >> +static unsigned long stack_maxrandom_size(unsigned long task_size) >> { >> unsigned long max = 0; >> if ((current->flags & PF_RANDOMIZE) && >> !(current->personality & ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE)) { >> - max = ((-1UL) & STACK_RND_MASK) << PAGE_SHIFT; >> + max = (-1UL); >> + max &= STACK_RND_MASK_MODE(task_size == TASK_SIZE_MAX); > > That just makes me barf, really. I have to go and lookup how TASK_SIZE_MAX > is defined in order to read that code. TASK_SIZE_MAX as is does not give a > hint at all that it means TASK_SIZE_MAX of 64 bit tasks. > > You just explained me that you want stuff proper for clarity reasons. So > what's so wrong with adding a helper inline tasksize_64bit() or such? I thought about that, but I'll need to redefine it under ifdefs :-/ I mean, for 32-bit native code. Hmm, I think, if I use is32bit parameter for __STACK_RND_MASK(), will it be more readable if I just compare to IA32_PAGE_OFFSET here? Or does it makes sence to introduce tasksize_32bit()? > >> + max <<= PAGE_SHIFT; >> } >> >> return max; >> @@ -51,8 +53,8 @@ static unsigned long stack_maxrandom_size(void) >> * >> * Leave an at least ~128 MB hole with possible stack randomization. >> */ >> -#define MIN_GAP (128*1024*1024UL + stack_maxrandom_size()) >> -#define MAX_GAP (TASK_SIZE/6*5) >> +#define MIN_GAP(task_size) (128*1024*1024UL + stack_maxrandom_size(task_size)) >> +#define MAX_GAP(task_size) (task_size/6*5) > > Eew. Yes it's existing macro mess, but there is not point in proliferating > that. That macro crap is only used in mmap_base() and there is no > justification for these unreadable macros at all. It just makes stuff > obfuscated for no reason. Just blindly making it more obfuscated does not > make it any better. > >> static int mmap_is_legacy(void) >> { >> @@ -88,16 +90,22 @@ unsigned long arch_mmap_rnd(void) >> return arch_native_rnd(); >> } > > #define SIZE_128M (128 * 1024 * 1024UL) > >> -static unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd) >> +static unsigned long mmap_base(unsigned long rnd, unsigned long task_size) >> { >> unsigned long gap = rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK); > unsigned long gap_min, gap_max; > > /* Add comment what this means */ > gap_min = SIZE_128M + stack_maxrandom_size(task_size); > /* Explain that ' /6 * 5' magic */ > gap_max = (task_size / 6) * 5; > > and use gap_min/gap_max below. That would be too intuitive and readable, > right? Haha, will do, thanks again. > >> - if (gap < MIN_GAP) >> - gap = MIN_GAP; >> - else if (gap > MAX_GAP) >> - gap = MAX_GAP; >> + if (gap < MIN_GAP(task_size)) >> + gap = MIN_GAP(task_size); >> + else if (gap > MAX_GAP(task_size)) >> + gap = MAX_GAP(task_size); >> >> - return PAGE_ALIGN(TASK_SIZE - gap - rnd); >> + return PAGE_ALIGN(task_size - gap - rnd); >> +} >> + >> +static unsigned long mmap_legacy_base(unsigned long rnd, >> + unsigned long task_size) > > Please align the argument in the second line with the argument in the first > one > > static unsigned long mmap_legacy_base(unsigned long rnd, > unsigned long task_size) Ok > > Thanks, > > tglx > -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org