From: <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<x86@kernel.org>
Cc: "Balbir Singh" <balbirs@nvidia.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, "Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Bert Karwatzki" <spasswolf@web.de>,
"Madhavan Srinivasan" <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
gourry@gourry.net, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86: memory_hotplug, do not bump up max_pfn for device private pages
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 14:11:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <692e1297e3b6_261c110064@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250401000752.249348-1-balbirs@nvidia.com>
[ add Gregory and linux-mm ]
[ full context for new Cc: ]
Balbir Singh wrote:
> Commit 7ffb791423c7 ("x86/kaslr: Reduce KASLR entropy on most x86 systems")
> exposed a bug with nokaslr and zone device
> interaction, as seen on a system with an AMD iGPU and dGPU (see [1]).
> The root cause of the issue is that, the gpu driver registers a zone
> device private memory region. When kaslr is disabled or the above commit
> is applied, the direct_map_physmem_end is set to much higher than 10 TiB
> typically to the 64TiB address. When zone device private memory is added
> to the system via add_pages(), it bumps up the max_pfn to the same
> value. This causes dma_addressing_limited() to return true, since the
> device cannot address memory all the way up to max_pfn.
>
> This caused a regression for games played on the iGPU, as it resulted in
> the DMA32 zone being used for GPU allocations.
>
> Fix this by not bumping up max_pfn on x86 systems, when pgmap is passed
> into add_pages(). The presence of pgmap is used to determine if device
> private memory is being added via add_pages().
>
> More details:
>
> devm_request_mem_region() and request_free_mem_region() request for
> device private memory. iomem_resource is passed as the base resource
> with start and end parameters. iomem_resource's end depends on several
> factors, including the platform and virtualization. On x86 for example
> on bare metal, this value is set to boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits.
> boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits can change depending on support for MKTME.
> By default it is set to the same as log2(direct_map_physmem_end) which
> is 46 to 52 bits depending on the number of levels in the page table.
> The allocation routines used iomem_resource's end and
> direct_map_physmem_end to figure out where to allocate the region.
>
> arch/powerpc is also impacted by this bug, this patch does not fix
> the issue for powerpc.
>
> Testing:
> 1. Tested on a virtual machine with test_hmm for zone device inseration
> 2. A previous version of this patch was tested by Bert, please see [2]
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250310112206.4168-1-spasswolf@web.de/ [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/d87680bab997fdc9fb4e638983132af235d9a03a.camel@web.de/ [2]
> Fixes: 7ffb791423c7 ("x86/kaslr: Reduce KASLR entropy on most x86 systems")
>
> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
> Cc: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>
> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
> ---
> I've left powerpc out of this regression change due to the time required
> to setup and test via qemu. I wanted to address the regression quickly
>
>
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index dce60767124f..cc60b57473a4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -970,9 +970,18 @@ int add_pages(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> ret = __add_pages(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages, params);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>
> - /* update max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory */
> - update_end_of_memory_vars(start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> - nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
> + /*
> + * add_pages() is called by memremap_pages() for adding device private
> + * pages. Do not bump up max_pfn in the device private path. max_pfn
> + * changes affect dma_addressing_limited. dma_addressing_limited
> + * returning true when max_pfn is the device's addressable memory,
> + * can force device drivers to use bounce buffers and impact their
> + * performance
> + */
> + if (!params->pgmap)
> + /* update max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory */
> + update_end_of_memory_vars(start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> + nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
The comment says that this adjustment is only for the device-private
case, but it applies to all driver-managed device memory.
Why not actually do what the comment says and limit this to
DEVICE_PRIVATE? I.e.:
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index 0e4270e20fad..4cc8175f9ffd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ int add_pages(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
* addressable memory can force device drivers to use bounce buffers
* and impact their performance negatively:
*/
- if (!params->pgmap)
+ if (!params->pgmap || params->pgmap->type != MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE)
/* update max_pfn, max_low_pfn and high_memory */
update_end_of_memory_vars(start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
next parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-01 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250401000752.249348-1-balbirs@nvidia.com>
2025-12-01 22:11 ` dan.j.williams [this message]
2025-12-01 23:01 ` Gregory Price
2025-12-02 22:40 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=692e1297e3b6_261c110064@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=spasswolf@web.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox