From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+53383ae265fb161ef488@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux@dominikbrodowski.net, mhocko@suse.com, rientjes@google.com,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
peterz@infradead.org, "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
boqun.feng@gmail.com
Subject: Re: WARNING: locking bug in lock_downgrade
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:46:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <69273d51-c129-6b0f-35eb-d98655476ff9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0acc6af-cdd5-0e46-bca5-2e2a9a4c983e@linux.alibaba.com>
On 12/12/2018 08:14 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
> Cc'ed Peter, Ingo and Waiman.
>
>
> It took me a few days to look into this warning, but I got lost in
> lockdep code.
>
>
> The problem is the commit dd2283f2605e ("mm: mmap: zap pages with read
> mmap_sem in munmap") does an optimization for munmap by downgrading
> write mmap_sem to read before zapping pages. But, lockdep reports
> downgrading a read lock.
>
>
> I'm pretty sure mmap_sem is held as write before downgrade_write() is
> called in the patch. And, there are 4 places which may downgrade a
> mmap_sem:
>
> - munmap
>
> - mremap
>
> - brk
>
> - clear_refs_write (fs/proc/task_mmu.c)
>
>
> The first three come from my patches, and they just do:
> down_write_killable() -> .. -> downgrade_write().
>
> But the last one is a little bit more complicated, it does down_read()
> ->.. -> up_read() ->.. -> down_write_killable() ->.. ->
> downgrade_write().
>
> And, the last one may be called from any process to touch the other
> processes' mmap_sem.
>
>
> By looking into lockdep code, I'm not sure if lockdep may get confused
> by such sequence or not?
>
>
> Any hint is appreciated.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Yang
The warning was printed because hlock->read was set when doing the
downgrade_write(). So it is either downgrade_write() was called a second
time or a read lock was held originally. It is hard to tell what is the
root cause without a reproducer.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-13 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-26 20:38 syzbot
2018-12-13 1:14 ` Yang Shi
2018-12-13 19:46 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2019-01-09 14:18 ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-01-09 22:46 ` Waiman Long
2019-01-10 2:45 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=69273d51-c129-6b0f-35eb-d98655476ff9@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=syzbot+53383ae265fb161ef488@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox