From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: memory_hotplug: check hwpoisoned page firstly in do_migrate_range()
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 22:10:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68067a56-4b9c-4636-9d07-41fee371d80c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56b9a389-4c36-4892-962d-b45878f30f4d@huawei.com>
>>
>> We're not checking the head page here, will this work reliably for
>> hugetlb? (I recall some difference in per-page hwpoison handling between
>> hugetlb and THP due to the vmemmap optimization)
>
> Before this changes, the hwposioned hugetlb page won't try to unmap in
> do_migrate_range(), we hope it already unmapped in memory_failure(), as
> mentioned from comments, there maybe fail to unmap, so a new safeguard
> to try to unmap it again here, but we don't need to guarantee it.
Thanks for clarifying!
But I do wonder if the PageHWPoison() is the right thing to do for hugetlb.
IIUC, hugetlb requires folio_test_hwpoison() -- testing the head page
not the subpage. Reason is that due to the vmemmap optimization we might
not be able to modify subpages to set hwpoison.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-25 1:16 [PATCH 0/4] mm: memory_hotplug: improve do_migrate_range() Kefeng Wang
2024-07-25 1:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: memory-failure: add unmap_posioned_folio() Kefeng Wang
2024-07-30 10:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-31 4:46 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-07-25 1:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: memory_hotplug: check hwpoisoned page firstly in do_migrate_range() Kefeng Wang
2024-07-30 10:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-31 5:09 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-01 20:10 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2024-08-02 7:50 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-06 9:29 ` David Hildenbrand
[not found] ` <1e6cccc5-fedc-8df6-1deb-16ceb52a4094@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <1e14d86d-0d17-41da-9400-16c9c6f93f8f@redhat.com>
2024-08-09 2:02 ` Miaohe Lin
2024-08-01 20:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-02 8:02 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-06 3:44 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-06 9:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-06 9:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-25 1:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: migrate: add isolate_folio_to_list() Kefeng Wang
2024-07-26 14:21 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-27 7:56 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-07-30 10:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-25 1:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: memory_hotplug: unify Huge/LRU/non-LRU movable folio isolation Kefeng Wang
2024-07-30 10:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-31 5:13 ` Kefeng Wang
2024-08-01 20:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-01 20:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-08-02 8:39 ` Kefeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68067a56-4b9c-4636-9d07-41fee371d80c@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox