From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E7CC433FE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 12:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7766061AA7 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 12:35:27 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 7766061AA7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B9EE49400FE; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 08:35:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B4E459400E4; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 08:35:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A17469400FE; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 08:35:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0028.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.28]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F0C9400E4 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 08:35:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin10.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D432DD87 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 12:35:26 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78647814252.10.69C8E43 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by imf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3877D00026E for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 12:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 340602267E; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 12:35:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1633091724; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q4IZyw0HKjpWG8FpWoJ5olxESNe0wgvOob+Uvoay5gA=; b=aR9pa16jIdPI4SJEmMtogi9KXxKOPLqXq+jfnK5hyBno/SkiLHr+mKWiFso/6WQUSkZm9U 5UyM77BGzDnuEIUBcDTmV7eRYmQwOVZ3KG44Ma+gTeA0lTaWAFI9/GlRGGORiWJv/k/GD/ gcXA+dwR4ORMi0rULPStgJyVD3YhhtY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1633091724; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q4IZyw0HKjpWG8FpWoJ5olxESNe0wgvOob+Uvoay5gA=; b=ZS3SDJSlBX0zXwDSe0NqNgvpOJUQHwxe9jAaUVGroyaueV022TY2o193sRfPBEkpa23iWb VMNM+4Lwnr8vqjCg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C21B13C59; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 12:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id QDXDAYwAV2EaYAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 01 Oct 2021 12:35:24 +0000 Message-ID: <6803f51e-69ea-fed0-112c-e40417836951@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 14:35:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.0.3 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm, slub: change percpu partial accounting from objects to pages Content-Language: en-US To: David Rientjes Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter , Joonsoo Kim , Pekka Enberg , Jann Horn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin , Mel Gorman References: <20210913170148.10992-1-vbabka@suse.cz> From: Vlastimil Babka In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A3877D00026E X-Stat-Signature: nb33b95hwsydzd3dbpf86ypi61n89hhw Authentication-Results: imf20.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=aR9pa16j; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=ZS3SDJSl; spf=pass (imf20.hostedemail.com: domain of vbabka@suse.cz designates 195.135.220.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vbabka@suse.cz; dmarc=none X-HE-Tag: 1633091725-679504 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 9/15/21 07:32, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sep 2021, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> We could also skip the intermediate step with target number of objects and >> rewrite the heuristic in terms of pages. However we still have the sysfs file >> cpu_partial which uses number of objects and could break existing users if it >> suddenly becomes number of pages, so this patch doesn't do that. >> >> In practice, after this patch the heuristics limit the size of percpu partial >> list up to 2 pages. In case of a reported regression (which would mean some >> workload has benefited from the previous imprecise object based counting), we >> can tune the heuristics to get a better compromise within the new scheme, while >> still avoid the unexpectedly long percpu partial lists. >> > > Curious if you've tried netperf TCP_RR with this change? This benchmark > was the most significantly improved benchmark that I recall with the > introduction of per-cpu partial slabs for SLUB. If there are any > regressions to be introduced by such an approach, I'm willing to bet that > it would be surfaced with that benchmark. > > Let me know if we can help in benchmarking. Mel was kind enough to run it through mmtests machinery for netperf (localhost) and hackbench and I finally processed the results, see below. So there are some apparent regressions, especially with hackbench, which I think ultimately boils down to having shorter percpu partial lists on average and some benchmarks benefiting from longer ones. Monitoring slab usage also indicated less memory usage by slab. So maybe I could try bumping the defaults somewhat as part of the patch, but certainly not such that we would limit the percpu partial lists to 30 pages just because previously a specific alloc/free pattern could lead to the limit of 30 objects translate to a limit to 30 pages - that would make little sense. This is a correctness patch, and if a workload benefits from larger lists, the sysfs tuning knobs are still there to use. Netperf 2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5218R CPU @ 2.10GHz (20 cores, 40 threads per socket), 384GB RAM TCP-RR: hmean before 127045.79 after 121092.94 (-4.69%, worse) stddev before 2634.37 after 1254.08 UDP-RR: hmean before 166985.45 after 160668.94 ( -3.78%, worse) stddev before 4059.69 after 1943.63 2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz (20 cores, 40 threads per socket), 512GB RAM TCP-RR: hmean before 84173.25 after 76914.72 ( -8.62%, worse) UDP-RR: hmean before 93571.12 after 96428.69 ( 3.05%, better) stddev before 23118.54 after 16828.14 2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz (12 cores, 24 threads per socket), 64GB RAM TCP-RR: hmean before 49984.92 after 48922.27 ( -2.13%, worse) stddev before 6248.15 after 4740.51 UDP-RR: hmean before 61854.31 after 68761.81 ( 11.17%, better) stddev before 4093.54 after 5898.91 other machines - within 2% Hackbench 2-socket AMD EPYC 7713 (64 cores, 128 threads per core), 256GB RAM hackbench-process-sockets (less is worse) Amean 1 0.5380 0.5583 ( -3.78%) Amean 4 0.7510 0.8150 ( -8.52%) Amean 7 0.7930 0.9533 ( -20.22%) Amean 12 0.7853 1.1313 ( -44.06%) Amean 21 1.1520 1.4993 ( -30.15%) Amean 30 1.6223 1.9237 ( -18.57%) Amean 48 2.6767 2.9903 ( -11.72%) Amean 79 4.0257 5.1150 ( -27.06%) Amean 110 5.5193 7.4720 ( -35.38%) Amean 141 7.2207 9.9840 ( -38.27%) Amean 172 8.4770 12.1963 ( -43.88%) Amean 203 9.6473 14.3137 ( -48.37%) Amean 234 11.3960 18.7917 ( -64.90%) Amean 265 13.9627 22.4607 ( -60.86%) Amean 296 14.9163 26.0483 ( -74.63%) hackbench-thread-sockets (less is worse) Amean 1 0.5597 0.5877 ( -5.00%) Amean 4 0.7913 0.8960 ( -13.23%) Amean 7 0.8190 1.0017 ( -22.30%) Amean 12 0.9560 1.1727 ( -22.66%) Amean 21 1.7587 1.5660 ( 10.96%) Amean 30 2.4477 1.9807 ( 19.08%) Amean 48 3.4573 3.0630 ( 11.41%) Amean 79 4.7903 5.1733 ( -8.00%) Amean 110 6.1370 7.4220 ( -20.94%) Amean 141 7.5777 9.2617 ( -22.22%) Amean 172 9.2280 11.0907 ( -20.18%) Amean 203 10.2793 13.3470 ( -29.84%) Amean 234 11.2410 17.1070 ( -52.18%) Amean 265 12.5970 23.3323 ( -85.22%) Amean 296 17.1540 24.2857 ( -41.57%) 2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5218R CPU @ 2.10GHz (20 cores, 40 threads per socket), 384GB RAM hackbench-process-sockets (less is worse) Amean 1 0.5760 0.4793 ( 16.78%) Amean 4 0.9430 0.9707 ( -2.93%) Amean 7 1.5517 1.8843 ( -21.44%) Amean 12 2.4903 2.7267 ( -9.49%) Amean 21 3.9560 4.2877 ( -8.38%) Amean 30 5.4613 5.8343 ( -6.83%) Amean 48 8.5337 9.2937 ( -8.91%) Amean 79 14.0670 15.2630 ( -8.50%) Amean 110 19.2253 21.2467 ( -10.51%) Amean 141 23.7557 25.8550 ( -8.84%) Amean 172 28.4407 29.7603 ( -4.64%) Amean 203 33.3407 33.9927 ( -1.96%) Amean 234 38.3633 39.1150 ( -1.96%) Amean 265 43.4420 43.8470 ( -0.93%) Amean 296 48.3680 48.9300 ( -1.16%) hackbench-thread-sockets (less is worse) Amean 1 0.6080 0.6493 ( -6.80%) Amean 4 1.0000 1.0513 ( -5.13%) Amean 7 1.6607 2.0260 ( -22.00%) Amean 12 2.7637 2.9273 ( -5.92%) Amean 21 5.0613 4.5153 ( 10.79%) Amean 30 6.3340 6.1140 ( 3.47%) Amean 48 9.0567 9.5577 ( -5.53%) Amean 79 14.5657 15.7983 ( -8.46%) Amean 110 19.6213 21.6333 ( -10.25%) Amean 141 24.1563 26.2697 ( -8.75%) Amean 172 28.9687 30.2187 ( -4.32%) Amean 203 33.9763 34.6970 ( -2.12%) Amean 234 38.8647 39.3207 ( -1.17%) Amean 265 44.0813 44.1507 ( -0.16%) Amean 296 49.2040 49.4330 ( -0.47%) 2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2698 v4 @ 2.20GHz (20 cores, 40 threads per socket), 512GB RAM hackbench-process-sockets (less is worse) Amean 1 0.5027 0.5017 ( 0.20%) Amean 4 1.1053 1.2033 ( -8.87%) Amean 7 1.8760 2.1820 ( -16.31%) Amean 12 2.9053 3.1810 ( -9.49%) Amean 21 4.6777 4.9920 ( -6.72%) Amean 30 6.5180 6.7827 ( -4.06%) Amean 48 10.0710 10.5227 ( -4.48%) Amean 79 16.4250 17.5053 ( -6.58%) Amean 110 22.6203 24.4617 ( -8.14%) Amean 141 28.0967 31.0363 ( -10.46%) Amean 172 34.4030 36.9233 ( -7.33%) Amean 203 40.5933 43.0850 ( -6.14%) Amean 234 46.6477 48.7220 ( -4.45%) Amean 265 53.0530 53.9597 ( -1.71%) Amean 296 59.2760 59.9213 ( -1.09%) hackbench-thread-sockets (less is worse) Amean 1 0.5363 0.5330 ( 0.62%) Amean 4 1.1647 1.2157 ( -4.38%) Amean 7 1.9237 2.2833 ( -18.70%) Amean 12 2.9943 3.3110 ( -10.58%) Amean 21 4.9987 5.1880 ( -3.79%) Amean 30 6.7583 7.0043 ( -3.64%) Amean 48 10.4547 10.8353 ( -3.64%) Amean 79 16.6707 17.6790 ( -6.05%) Amean 110 22.8207 24.4403 ( -7.10%) Amean 141 28.7090 31.0533 ( -8.17%) Amean 172 34.9387 36.8260 ( -5.40%) Amean 203 41.1567 43.0450 ( -4.59%) Amean 234 47.3790 48.5307 ( -2.43%) Amean 265 53.9543 54.6987 ( -1.38%) Amean 296 60.0820 60.2163 ( -0.22%) 1-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v5 @ 3.50GHz (4 cores, 8 threads), 32 GB RAM hackbench-process-sockets (less is worse) Amean 1 1.4760 1.5773 ( -6.87%) Amean 3 3.9370 4.0910 ( -3.91%) Amean 5 6.6797 6.9357 ( -3.83%) Amean 7 9.3367 9.7150 ( -4.05%) Amean 12 15.7627 16.1400 ( -2.39%) Amean 18 23.5360 23.6890 ( -0.65%) Amean 24 31.0663 31.3137 ( -0.80%) Amean 30 38.7283 39.0037 ( -0.71%) Amean 32 41.3417 41.6097 ( -0.65%) hackbench-thread-sockets (less is worse) Amean 1 1.5250 1.6043 ( -5.20%) Amean 3 4.0897 4.2603 ( -4.17%) Amean 5 6.7760 7.0933 ( -4.68%) Amean 7 9.4817 9.9157 ( -4.58%) Amean 12 15.9610 16.3937 ( -2.71%) Amean 18 23.9543 24.3417 ( -1.62%) Amean 24 31.4400 31.7217 ( -0.90%) Amean 30 39.2457 39.5467 ( -0.77%) Amean 32 41.8267 42.1230 ( -0.71%) 2-socket Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz (12 cores, 24 threads per socket), 64GB RAM hackbench-process-sockets (less is worse) Amean 1 1.0347 1.0880 ( -5.15%) Amean 4 1.7267 1.8527 ( -7.30%) Amean 7 2.6707 2.8110 ( -5.25%) Amean 12 4.1617 4.3383 ( -4.25%) Amean 21 7.0070 7.2600 ( -3.61%) Amean 30 9.9187 10.2397 ( -3.24%) Amean 48 15.6710 16.3923 ( -4.60%) Amean 79 24.7743 26.1247 ( -5.45%) Amean 110 34.3000 35.9307 ( -4.75%) Amean 141 44.2043 44.8010 ( -1.35%) Amean 172 54.2430 54.7260 ( -0.89%) Amean 192 60.6557 60.9777 ( -0.53%) hackbench-thread-sockets (less is worse) Amean 1 1.0610 1.1353 ( -7.01%) Amean 4 1.7543 1.9140 ( -9.10%) Amean 7 2.7840 2.9573 ( -6.23%) Amean 12 4.3813 4.4937 ( -2.56%) Amean 21 7.3460 7.5350 ( -2.57%) Amean 30 10.2313 10.5190 ( -2.81%) Amean 48 15.9700 16.5940 ( -3.91%) Amean 79 25.3973 26.6637 ( -4.99%) Amean 110 35.1087 36.4797 ( -3.91%) Amean 141 45.8220 46.3053 ( -1.05%) Amean 172 55.4917 55.7320 ( -0.43%) Amean 192 62.7490 62.5410 ( 0.33%)