From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <gourry@gourry.net>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
<joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>, <david@redhat.com>,
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>, <osalvador@suse.de>,
<kernel_team@skhynix.com>, <honggyu.kim@sk.com>,
<yunjeong.mun@sk.com>, <rakie.kim@sk.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] mm/mempolicy: Prepare weighted interleave sysfs for memory hotplug
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 20:43:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67f5eccfd6ce0_720529435@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408073243.488-3-rakie.kim@sk.com>
Rakie Kim wrote:
> Previously, the weighted interleave sysfs structure was statically
> managed during initialization. This prevented new nodes from being
> recognized when memory hotplug events occurred, limiting the ability
> to update or extend sysfs entries dynamically at runtime.
>
> To address this, this patch refactors the sysfs infrastructure and
> encapsulates it within a new structure, `sysfs_wi_group`, which holds
> both the kobject and an array of node attribute pointers.
>
> By allocating this group structure globally, the per-node sysfs
> attributes can be managed beyond initialization time, enabling
> external modules to insert or remove node entries in response to
> events such as memory hotplug or node online/offline transitions.
>
> Instead of allocating all per-node sysfs attributes at once, the
> initialization path now uses the existing sysfs_wi_node_add() and
> sysfs_wi_node_delete() helpers. This refactoring makes it possible
> to modularly manage per-node sysfs entries and ensures the
> infrastructure is ready for runtime extension.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>
> Signed-off-by: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yunjeong Mun <yunjeong.mun@sk.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> ---
> mm/mempolicy.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 0da102aa1cfc..988575f29c53 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -3419,6 +3419,13 @@ struct iw_node_attr {
> int nid;
> };
>
> +struct sysfs_wi_group {
> + struct kobject wi_kobj;
> + struct iw_node_attr *nattrs[];
> +};
> +
> +static struct sysfs_wi_group *wi_group;
> +
> static ssize_t node_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> {
> @@ -3461,27 +3468,24 @@ static ssize_t node_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
> return count;
> }
>
> -static struct iw_node_attr **node_attrs;
> -
> -static void sysfs_wi_node_release(struct iw_node_attr *node_attr,
> - struct kobject *parent)
> +static void sysfs_wi_node_delete(int nid)
> {
> - if (!node_attr)
> + if (!wi_group->nattrs[nid])
> return;
> - sysfs_remove_file(parent, &node_attr->kobj_attr.attr);
> - kfree(node_attr->kobj_attr.attr.name);
> - kfree(node_attr);
> +
> + sysfs_remove_file(&wi_group->wi_kobj,
> + &wi_group->nattrs[nid]->kobj_attr.attr);
This still looks broken to me, but I think this is more a problem that
was present in the original code.
At this point @wi_group's reference count is zero because
sysfs_wi_release() has been called. However, it can only be zero if it has
properly transitioned through kobject_del() and final kobject_put(). It
follows that kobject_del() arranges for kobj->sd to be NULL. That means
that this *should* be hitting the WARN() in kernfs_remove_by_name_ns()
for the !parent case.
So, either you are not triggering that path, or testing that path, but
sys_remove_file() of the child attributes should be happening *before*
sysfs_wi_release().
Did I miss something?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 7:32 [PATCH v7 0/3] Enhance sysfs handling for memory hotplug in weighted interleave Rakie Kim
2025-04-08 7:32 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] mm/mempolicy: Fix memory leaks in weighted interleave sysfs Rakie Kim
2025-04-08 13:45 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-04-15 15:41 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-08 7:32 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] mm/mempolicy: Prepare weighted interleave sysfs for memory hotplug Rakie Kim
2025-04-08 13:49 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-04-09 3:43 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2025-04-09 3:54 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-09 5:56 ` Rakie Kim
2025-04-09 18:51 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-10 7:53 ` Rakie Kim
2025-04-10 8:06 ` Rakie Kim
2025-04-11 3:11 ` Andrew Morton
2025-04-11 7:21 ` Rakie Kim
2025-04-11 22:24 ` Dan Williams
2025-04-08 7:32 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] mm/mempolicy: Support memory hotplug in weighted interleave Rakie Kim
2025-04-08 13:52 ` Joshua Hahn
2025-04-08 14:45 ` Gregory Price
2025-04-09 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-09 11:39 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-04-09 11:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-10 7:53 ` Rakie Kim
2025-04-10 13:25 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-04-10 13:41 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-15 16:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-16 4:04 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-04-16 7:37 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-04-16 7:49 ` Rakie Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67f5eccfd6ce0_720529435@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yunjeong.mun@sk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox