From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Marek Marczykowski-G?recki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: fix build_zonerefs_node()
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 14:49:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67bde881-434e-8aca-ac68-21aff4bdb231@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220407115414.GA4148@techsingularity.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2680 bytes --]
On 07.04.22 14:32, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 01:17:19PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 07.04.22 13:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Thu 07-04-22 12:45:41, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> On 07.04.22 12:34, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>>> Ccing Mel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu 07-04-22 11:32:21, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>>> Since commit 9d3be21bf9c0 ("mm, page_alloc: simplify zonelist
>>>>>> initialization") only zones with free memory are included in a built
>>>>>> zonelist. This is problematic when e.g. all memory of a zone has been
>>>>>> ballooned out.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the actual problem there?
>>>>
>>>> When running as Xen guest new hotplugged memory will not be onlined
>>>> automatically, but only on special request. This is done in order to
>>>> support adding e.g. the possibility to use another GB of memory, while
>>>> adding only a part of that memory initially.
>>>>
>>>> In case adding that memory is populating a new zone, the page allocator
>>>> won't be able to use this memory when it is onlined, as the zone wasn't
>>>> added to the zonelist, due to managed_zone() returning 0.
>>>
>>> How is that memory onlined? Because "regular" onlining (online_pages())
>>> does rebuild zonelists if their zone hasn't been populated before.
>>
>> The Xen balloon driver has an own callback for onlining pages. The pages
>> are just added to the ballooned-out page list without handing them to the
>> allocator. This is done only when the guest is ballooned up.
>>
>
> Is this new behaviour? I ask because keeping !managed_zones out of the
For some time (since kernel 5.9) Xen is using the zone device functionality
with memremap_pages() and pgmap->type = MEMORY_DEVICE_GENERIC.
> zonelist and reclaim paths and the behaviour makes sense. Elsewhere you
> state "zone can always happen to have no free memory left" and this is true
> but it's usually a transient event. The difference between a populated
And if this "transient event" is just happening when the zonelists are
being rebuilt the zone will be off the lists maybe forever.
> vs managed zone is usually permanent event where no memory will ever be
> placed on the buddy lists because the memory was reserved early in boot
> or a similar reason. The patch is probably harmless but it has the
> potential to waste CPUs allocating or reclaiming from zones that will
> never succeed.
I'd recommend to have an explicit flag per-zone for this case if you
really care about that. This would be much cleaner than to imply from
no free page being present at a specific point in time, that the zone
will never be subject to memory allocation.
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3149 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-07 9:32 Juergen Gross
2022-04-07 9:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-07 10:06 ` Juergen Gross
2022-04-08 23:21 ` Wei Yang
2022-04-07 10:34 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-07 10:45 ` Juergen Gross
2022-04-07 11:07 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-07 11:17 ` Juergen Gross
2022-04-07 11:40 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-07 11:48 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-07 11:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-07 12:04 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-07 12:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-04-07 13:23 ` Michal Hocko
2022-04-07 12:32 ` Mel Gorman
2022-04-07 12:49 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67bde881-434e-8aca-ac68-21aff4bdb231@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox