From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] mm: do not export const kfree and kstrdup variants
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 21:45:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67060a27-5830-4ea1-955f-722f1d2c83b4@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZvJkC_3cov1rfY0V@infradead.org>
Le 24/09/2024 à 09:02, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 03:56:53PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>> Totally agree with all the points, I haven't looked at how
>> popular that API was before sending out the patch. Is there
>> some sort of "built time const" but for strings that we, perhaps,
>> can add to kfree_const() (and make kfree_const() always inline)?
>> So that we can turn this
>>
>> str = "boom";
>> ...
>> kfree_const(str);
>>
>> into a safe scenario for modules.
>
> Not sure, but even then the API would be horrible as it still would
> not work for constants in other modules than the one calling it.
>
>
So, the best is to audit, at least code that can be built as a module
for str = "boom" pattern, and fix relevant places?
Or, considering that these these _const() versions are only there to
save a few bytes of memory, wonder if it really worth it?
In other word:
1) apply something like the patch below
2) remove the API
At a minimum, I think that devm_kstrdup_const() could be removed.
CJ
diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index 4f1275023eb7..fd5e98fb6362 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -39,8 +39,7 @@
*/
void kfree_const(const void *x)
{
- if (!is_kernel_rodata((unsigned long)x))
- kfree(x);
+ kfree(x);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree_const);
@@ -81,9 +80,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kstrdup);
*/
const char *kstrdup_const(const char *s, gfp_t gfp)
{
- if (is_kernel_rodata((unsigned long)s))
- return s;
-
return kstrdup(s, gfp);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kstrdup_const);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-24 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-24 5:08 Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-09-24 6:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-09-24 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 6:56 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-09-24 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 19:45 ` Christophe JAILLET [this message]
2024-09-24 17:41 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67060a27-5830-4ea1-955f-722f1d2c83b4@wanadoo.fr \
--to=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox