From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zps76.corp.google.com (zps76.corp.google.com [172.25.146.76]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id l4A475q3032628 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 21:07:05 -0700 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (pyhf31.prod.google.com [10.34.233.31]) by zps76.corp.google.com with ESMTP id l4A46sBx032289 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 21:06:54 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id f31so354797pyh for ; Wed, 09 May 2007 21:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <65dd6fd50705092106i15722e97g85f43191ceb5a3d7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 21:06:53 -0700 From: "Ollie Wild" Subject: Re: [patch] removes MAX_ARG_PAGES In-Reply-To: <200705092104.43353.rob@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <65dd6fd50705060151m78bb9b4fpcb941b16a8c4709e@mail.gmail.com> <20070509134815.81cb9aa9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200705092104.43353.rob@landley.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Rob Landley Cc: Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen List-ID: On 5/9/07, Rob Landley wrote: > Just FYI, a really really quick and dirty way of testing this sort of thing on > more architectures and you're likely to physically have? Does this properly emulate caching? On parisc, cache coherency was the main issue we ran into. I suspect this might be the case with other architectures as well. Ollie -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org