From: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] memcg: fix pre_destory handler
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:35:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830812101035v33dbc6cfh57aa5510f6d65d54@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29741.10.75.179.61.1228908581.squirrel@webmail-b.css.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:29 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> (BTW, I don't like hierarchy-walk-by-small-locks approarch now because
> I'd like to implement scan-and-stop-continue routine.
> See how readdir() aginst /proc scans PID. It's very roboust against
> very temporal PIDs.)
So you mean that you want to be able to sleep, and then contine
approximately where you left off, without keeping any kind of
reference count on the last cgroup that you touched? OK, so in that
case I agree that you would need some kind of hierarch
> I tried similar patch and made it to use only one shared refcnt.
> (my previous patch...)
A crucial difference is that your css_tryget() fails if the cgroups
framework is trying to remove the cgroup but might abort due to
another subsystem holding a reference, whereas mine spins and if the
rmdir is aborted it will return a refcount.
>
> We need rolling update of refcnts and rollback. Such code tends to make
> a hole (This was what my first patch did...).
Can you clarify what you mean by "rolling update of refcnts"?
>
> 1. pre_destroy() is called by rmdir(), in synchronized manner.
> This means that all refs in memcg will be removed at rmdir().
> If we drop refs at destroy(), it happens when dput()'s refcnt finally
> goes down to 0. This asynchronous manner is not good for users.
OK, fair enough.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-10 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-09 11:02 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] cgroup id and mix fixes (2008/12/09) KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-09 11:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] memcg: Documentation for internal implementation KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-10 0:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-10 1:02 ` Li Zefan
2008-12-10 1:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-09 11:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] memcg: fix pre_destory handler KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-10 2:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-10 2:19 ` Li Zefan
2008-12-10 2:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-10 2:28 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-10 2:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-10 3:03 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-10 4:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-10 10:40 ` Paul Menage
2008-12-10 11:29 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-10 13:25 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-10 13:47 ` Daisuke Nishimura
2008-12-10 18:26 ` Paul Menage
2008-12-10 18:25 ` Paul Menage
2008-12-10 18:35 ` Paul Menage [this message]
2008-12-10 19:00 ` Paul Menage
2008-12-11 0:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-11 0:24 ` Paul Menage
2008-12-11 1:06 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-11 12:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-11 0:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-11 0:28 ` Paul Menage
2008-12-11 1:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-09 11:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] cgroup id KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-09 11:09 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] Flat hierarchical reclaim by ID KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-09 12:27 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-09 14:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-09 15:46 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-09 16:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-10 2:49 ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-10 3:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-09 11:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] fix inactive_ratio under hierarchy KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-11 3:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-11 3:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-12-09 11:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] fix oom " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6599ad830812101035v33dbc6cfh57aa5510f6d65d54@mail.gmail.com \
--to=menage@google.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox