From: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Sudhir Kumar <skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
taka@valinux.co.jp, linux-mm@kvack.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][0/3] Virtual address space control for cgroups (v2)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:59:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830803270659s3e23edaava58d7403b7262369@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080327190323.f55a73e9.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:03 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> How about creating "rlimit controller" and expands rlimit to process groups ?
> I think it's more straightforward to do this.
>
Yes, that could be useful - the only concern that I would have is that
putting all the rlimits in the same subsystem could limit flexibility.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-27 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-26 18:49 Balbir Singh
2008-03-26 18:50 ` [RFC][1/3] Add user interface for virtual address space control (v2) Balbir Singh
2008-03-27 9:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-27 9:39 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-27 9:46 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-26 18:50 ` [RFC][2/3] Account and control virtual address space allocations (v2) Balbir Singh
2008-03-26 19:10 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-27 7:19 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-27 8:02 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-27 8:24 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-27 8:30 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-27 8:38 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-03-26 18:50 ` [RFC][3/3] Update documentation for virtual address space control (v2) Balbir Singh
2008-03-26 22:22 ` [RFC][0/3] Virtual address space control for cgroups (v2) Paul Menage
2008-03-27 8:04 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-27 14:28 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-27 17:50 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-27 18:44 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-28 3:59 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-28 14:37 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-28 18:13 ` Balbir Singh
2008-03-27 10:03 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-03-27 13:59 ` Paul Menage [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6599ad830803270659s3e23edaava58d7403b7262369@mail.gmail.com \
--to=menage@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox