linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <willy@infradead.org>,
	<david@redhat.com>, <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <shy828301@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] mm: mlock: update mlock_pte_range to handle large folio
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 09:52:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65523232-58d4-a8c7-50ff-8f44f7ac23fc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79f6822-f2f8-aba4-b517-b661d07e2d@google.com>



On 7/19/2023 10:26 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Yin Fengwei wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Could this also happen against normal 4K page? I mean when user try to munlock
>>>>>>>>>>> a normal 4K page and this 4K page is isolated. So it become unevictable page?
>>>>>>>>>> Looks like it can be possible. If cpu 1 is in __munlock_folio() and
>>>>>>>>>> cpu 2 is isolating the folio for any purpose:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> cpu1                        cpu2
>>>>>>>>>>                             isolate folio
>>>>>>>>>> folio_test_clear_lru() // 0
>>>>>>>>>>                             putback folio // add to unevictable list
>>>>>>>>>> folio_test_clear_mlocked()
>>>>>>>                                folio_set_lru()
>> Let's wait the response from Huge and Yu. :).
> 
> I haven't been able to give it enough thought, but I suspect you are right:
> that the current __munlock_folio() is deficient when folio_test_clear_lru()
> fails.
> 
> (Though it has not been reported as a problem in practice: perhaps because
> so few places try to isolate from the unevictable "list".)
> 
> I forget what my order of development was, but it's likely that I first
> wrote the version for our own internal kernel - which used our original
> lruvec locking, which did not depend on getting PG_lru first (having got
> lru_lock, it checked memcg, then tried again if that had changed).
> 
> I was uneasy with the PG_lru aspect of upstream lru_lock implementation,
> but it turned out to work okay - elsewhere; but it looks as if I missed
> its implication when adapting __munlock_page() for upstream.
> 
> If I were trying to fix this __munlock_folio() race myself (sorry, I'm
> not), I would first look at that aspect: instead of folio_test_clear_lru()
> behaving always like a trylock, could "folio_wait_clear_lru()" or whatever
> spin waiting for PG_lru here?
Considering following sequence:
    CPU1 (migration)                            CPU2 (mlock)

    isolation page (clear lru)                  mlock_pte_range
        try_to_migrate                              -> take_pte_lock
            try_to_migrate_one                      munlock_folio
                pvmw -> take pte lock                   __munlock_folio if batch full
                                                           folio_wait_clear_lru

deadlock may happen.


Regards
Yin, Fengwei

> 
> Hugh


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-20  1:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-12  6:01 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] support large folio for mlock Yin Fengwei
2023-07-12  6:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm: add functions folio_in_range() and folio_within_vma() Yin Fengwei
2023-07-12  6:11   ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-12  6:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] mm: handle large folio when large folio in VM_LOCKED VMA range Yin Fengwei
2023-07-12  6:23   ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-12  6:43     ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-12 17:03       ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-13  1:55         ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-14  2:21       ` Hugh Dickins
2023-07-14  2:49         ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-14  3:41           ` Hugh Dickins
2023-07-14  5:45             ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-12  6:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] mm: mlock: update mlock_pte_range to handle large folio Yin Fengwei
2023-07-12  6:31   ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-15  6:06     ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-16 23:59       ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-17  0:35         ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-17  1:58           ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-18 22:48             ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-18 23:47               ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-19  1:32                 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-19  1:52                   ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-19  1:57                     ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-19  2:00                       ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-19  2:09                         ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-19  2:22                           ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-19  2:28                             ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-19 14:26                               ` Hugh Dickins
2023-07-19 15:44                                 ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-20 12:02                                   ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-20 20:51                                     ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-21  1:12                                       ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-21  1:35                                         ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-21  3:18                                           ` Yin, Fengwei
2023-07-21  3:39                                             ` Yosry Ahmed
2023-07-20  1:52                                 ` Yin, Fengwei [this message]
2023-07-17  8:12           ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-18  2:06             ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-18  3:59               ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-26 12:49       ` Yin Fengwei
2023-07-26 16:57         ` Yu Zhao
2023-07-27  0:15           ` Yin Fengwei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65523232-58d4-a8c7-50ff-8f44f7ac23fc@intel.com \
    --to=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
    --cc=yuzhao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox