From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com, jane.chu@oracle.com,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] mm: hugetlb: directly pass order when allocate a hugetlb folio
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2025 21:11:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64DE9265-7B31-4128-9949-84AF050CBFF4@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902124820.3081488-4-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
On 2 Sep 2025, at 8:48, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Use order instead of struct hstate to remove huge_page_order() call
> from all hugetlb folio allocation.
>
> Reviewed-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
> mm/hugetlb_cma.c | 3 +--
> mm/hugetlb_cma.h | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 4131467fc1cd..5c93faf82674 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1473,17 +1473,16 @@ static int hstate_next_node_to_free(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
> #ifdef CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC
> -static struct folio *alloc_gigantic_folio(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> +static struct folio *alloc_gigantic_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> int nid, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> {
> struct folio *folio;
> - int order = huge_page_order(h);
> bool retried = false;
>
> if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> nid = numa_mem_id();
> retry:
> - folio = hugetlb_cma_alloc_folio(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
> + folio = hugetlb_cma_alloc_folio(order, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
> if (!folio) {
> if (hugetlb_cma_exclusive_alloc())
> return NULL;
> @@ -1506,16 +1505,16 @@ static struct folio *alloc_gigantic_folio(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> }
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC */
> -static struct folio *alloc_gigantic_folio(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - int nid, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> +static struct folio *alloc_gigantic_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> + nodemask_t *nodemask)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_CONTIG_ALLOC */
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE */
> -static struct folio *alloc_gigantic_folio(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> - int nid, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> +static struct folio *alloc_gigantic_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> + nodemask_t *nodemask)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -1926,11 +1925,9 @@ struct address_space *hugetlb_folio_mapping_lock_write(struct folio *folio)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static struct folio *alloc_buddy_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h,
> - gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, nodemask_t *nmask,
> - nodemask_t *node_alloc_noretry)
> +static struct folio *alloc_buddy_hugetlb_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> + int nid, nodemask_t *nmask, nodemask_t *node_alloc_noretry)
> {
> - int order = huge_page_order(h);
> struct folio *folio;
> bool alloc_try_hard = true;
>
> @@ -1980,11 +1977,13 @@ static struct folio *only_alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h,
> nodemask_t *node_alloc_noretry)
> {
> struct folio *folio;
> + int order = huge_page_order(h);
>
> - if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> - folio = alloc_gigantic_folio(h, gfp_mask, nid, nmask);
> + if (order > MAX_PAGE_ORDER)
Would it be better to add
bool order_is_gigantic(unsigned int order)
{
return order > MAX_PAGE_ORDER;
}
for this check? And change hstate_is_gigantic() to
return order_is_gigantic(huge_page_order(h));
To make _is_gigantic() check more consistent.
BTW, isolate_or_dissolve_huge_folio() can use order_is_gigantic() too.
Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> + folio = alloc_gigantic_folio(order, gfp_mask, nid, nmask);
> else
> - folio = alloc_buddy_hugetlb_folio(h, gfp_mask, nid, nmask, node_alloc_noretry);
> + folio = alloc_buddy_hugetlb_folio(order, gfp_mask, nid, nmask,
> + node_alloc_noretry);
> if (folio)
> init_new_hugetlb_folio(h, folio);
> return folio;
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
> index f58ef4969e7a..e8e4dc7182d5 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_cma.c
> @@ -26,11 +26,10 @@ void hugetlb_cma_free_folio(struct folio *folio)
> }
>
>
> -struct folio *hugetlb_cma_alloc_folio(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> +struct folio *hugetlb_cma_alloc_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> int nid, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> {
> int node;
> - int order = huge_page_order(h);
> struct folio *folio = NULL;
>
> if (hugetlb_cma[nid])
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cma.h b/mm/hugetlb_cma.h
> index f7d7fb9880a2..2c2ec8a7e134 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb_cma.h
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_cma.h
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> void hugetlb_cma_free_folio(struct folio *folio);
> -struct folio *hugetlb_cma_alloc_folio(struct hstate *h, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> +struct folio *hugetlb_cma_alloc_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> int nid, nodemask_t *nodemask);
> struct huge_bootmem_page *hugetlb_cma_alloc_bootmem(struct hstate *h, int *nid,
> bool node_exact);
> @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ static inline void hugetlb_cma_free_folio(struct folio *folio)
> {
> }
>
> -static inline struct folio *hugetlb_cma_alloc_folio(struct hstate *h,
> - gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> +static inline struct folio *hugetlb_cma_alloc_folio(int order, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> + int nid, nodemask_t *nodemask)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> --
> 2.27.0
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 12:48 [PATCH v2 0/9] mm: hugetlb: cleanup and allocate frozen " Kefeng Wang
2025-09-02 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: hugetlb: convert to use more alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio() Kefeng Wang
2025-09-08 9:21 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-09-08 12:59 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-09-09 0:54 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-02 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mm: hugetlb: convert to account_new_hugetlb_folio() Kefeng Wang
2025-09-08 9:26 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-09-08 13:20 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-09-08 13:38 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-09-08 13:40 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-09-09 7:04 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-09-09 0:59 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-02 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mm: hugetlb: directly pass order when allocate a hugetlb folio Kefeng Wang
2025-09-08 9:29 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-09-09 1:11 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2025-09-09 7:11 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-09-02 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mm: hugetlb: remove struct hstate from init_new_hugetlb_folio() Kefeng Wang
2025-09-08 9:31 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-09-09 1:13 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-02 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mm: hugeltb: check NUMA_NO_NODE in only_alloc_fresh_hugetlb_folio() Kefeng Wang
2025-09-08 9:34 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-09-09 1:16 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-02 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] mm: page_alloc: add alloc_contig_frozen_pages() Kefeng Wang
2025-09-09 0:21 ` jane.chu
2025-09-09 1:44 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-09 7:29 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-09-09 8:11 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-09-09 18:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-09-09 19:08 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-10 2:05 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-09-02 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mm: cma: add alloc flags for __cma_alloc() Kefeng Wang
2025-09-09 0:19 ` jane.chu
2025-09-09 2:03 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-09 8:05 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-09-02 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mm: cma: add __cma_release() Kefeng Wang
2025-09-09 0:15 ` jane.chu
2025-09-02 12:48 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] mm: hugetlb: allocate frozen pages in alloc_gigantic_folio() Kefeng Wang
2025-09-09 1:48 ` jane.chu
2025-09-09 7:33 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-09-09 2:02 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-09 7:34 ` Kefeng Wang
2025-09-02 13:51 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] mm: hugetlb: cleanup and allocate frozen hugetlb folio Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64DE9265-7B31-4128-9949-84AF050CBFF4@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox