Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] mm/shmem: Introduce F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE

[Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>]

On 1/18/22 14:21, Chao Peng wrote:
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Introduce a new seal F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE indicating the content of
> the file is inaccessible from userspace through ordinary MMU access
> (e.g., read/write/mmap). However, the file content can be accessed
> via a different mechanism (e.g. KVM MMU) indirectly.
> 
> It provides semantics required for KVM guest private memory support
> that a file descriptor with this seal set is going to be used as the
> source of guest memory in confidential computing environments such
> as Intel TDX/AMD SEV but may not be accessible from host userspace.
> 
> At this time only shmem implements this seal.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h |  1 +
>  mm/shmem.c                 | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
> index 2f86b2ad6d7e..09ef34754dfa 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>  #define F_SEAL_GROW	0x0004	/* prevent file from growing */
>  #define F_SEAL_WRITE	0x0008	/* prevent writes */
>  #define F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE	0x0010  /* prevent future writes while mapped */
> +#define F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE	0x0020  /* prevent ordinary MMU access (e.g. read/write/mmap) to file content */
>  /* (1U << 31) is reserved for signed error codes */
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index 18f93c2d68f1..72185630e7c4 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -1098,6 +1098,13 @@ static int shmem_setattr(struct user_namespace *mnt_userns,
>  		    (newsize > oldsize && (info->seals & F_SEAL_GROW)))
>  			return -EPERM;
>  
> +		if (info->seals & F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE) {
> +			if(i_size_read(inode))

Is this needed? The rest of the function seems to trust oldsize obtained by
plain reading inode->i_size well enough, so why be suddenly paranoid here?

> +				return -EPERM;
> +			if (newsize & ~PAGE_MASK)
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
>  		if (newsize != oldsize) {
>  			error = shmem_reacct_size(SHMEM_I(inode)->flags,
>  					oldsize, newsize);
> @@ -1364,6 +1371,8 @@ static int shmem_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
>  		goto redirty;
>  	if (!total_swap_pages)
>  		goto redirty;
> +	if (info->seals & F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE)
> +		goto redirty;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Our capabilities prevent regular writeback or sync from ever calling
> @@ -2262,6 +2271,9 @@ static int shmem_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	if (info->seals & F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE)
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
>  	/* arm64 - allow memory tagging on RAM-based files */
>  	vma->vm_flags |= VM_MTE_ALLOWED;
>  
> @@ -2459,12 +2471,15 @@ shmem_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
>  	pgoff_t index = pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
>  	/* i_rwsem is held by caller */
> -	if (unlikely(info->seals & (F_SEAL_GROW |
> -				   F_SEAL_WRITE | F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE))) {
> +	if (unlikely(info->seals & (F_SEAL_GROW | F_SEAL_WRITE |
> +				    F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE |
> +				    F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE))) {
>  		if (info->seals & (F_SEAL_WRITE | F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE))
>  			return -EPERM;
>  		if ((info->seals & F_SEAL_GROW) && pos + len > inode->i_size)
>  			return -EPERM;
> +		if (info->seals & F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE)
> +			return -EPERM;
>  	}
>  
>  	return shmem_getpage(inode, index, pagep, SGP_WRITE);
> @@ -2538,6 +2553,21 @@ static ssize_t shmem_file_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>  		end_index = i_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  		if (index > end_index)
>  			break;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * inode_lock protects setting up seals as well as write to
> +		 * i_size. Setting F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE only allowed with
> +		 * i_size == 0.
> +		 *
> +		 * Check F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE after i_size. It effectively
> +		 * serialize read vs. setting F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE without
> +		 * taking inode_lock in read path.
> +		 */
> +		if (SHMEM_I(inode)->seals & F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE) {
> +			error = -EPERM;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
>  		if (index == end_index) {
>  			nr = i_size & ~PAGE_MASK;
>  			if (nr <= offset)
> @@ -2663,6 +2693,12 @@ static long shmem_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  
> +		if ((info->seals & F_SEAL_INACCESSIBLE) &&
> +		    (offset & ~PAGE_MASK || len & ~PAGE_MASK)) {

Could we use PAGE_ALIGNED()?

> +			error = -EINVAL;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
>  		shmem_falloc.waitq = &shmem_falloc_waitq;
>  		shmem_falloc.start = (u64)unmap_start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  		shmem_falloc.next = (unmap_end + 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;