From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add mm GUP section
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 19:50:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <642e64e5-97a5-4c3f-8c4d-8cd4a6e3da58@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0faa6c1f-26a5-4d96-8bd7-bfd344a80ff8@redhat.com>
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 07:43:44PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 08.05.25 18:03, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > I feel we should probably add mm/oom_kill.c, include/linux/mman.h,
> > mm/internal.h to mm core as a few more key files. What do you think?
>
> The latte two likely yes.
>
> Hmm, one could argue that oom_kill might be memory reclaim related.
I suppose it's an extreme form of reclaim :) or the ultimate state of reclaim,
and of course invoked by reclaim so yeah that makes sense...
I guess when I un-RFC the reclaim patch I can add it in :)
>
> Fortunately, that code is not too complicated ...
Well we're about to have BPF OOM killer right? So this might change soon... it's
also why this came to mind.
>
> >
> > We're probably going to be working through a bunch of stragglers for some
> > time I feel :)
>
> Yeah, there are many files ...
I guess key point is to lay the foundations so we can iterate more over time :)
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 17:36 Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-06 17:41 ` John Hubbard
2025-05-06 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
2025-05-07 8:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-07 9:02 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-05-07 9:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-07 9:59 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-05-08 8:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-08 12:23 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
[not found] ` <6050270f-1556-4df3-beab-63e907b28d82@lucifer.local>
2025-05-08 17:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-08 18:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-05-12 7:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-12 12:54 ` Zi Yan
2025-05-12 13:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-12 13:10 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-12 13:06 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-13 6:23 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=642e64e5-97a5-4c3f-8c4d-8cd4a6e3da58@lucifer.local \
--to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox