linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	"Mike Kravetz" <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/memory-failure.c: fix race with changing page compound again
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:28:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <63c118d0-da95-4b43-3d1b-1d69f8241801@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220308065658.GA610534@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>

On 2022/3/8 14:56, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 11:07:32AM -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> ...
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +       /**
>>>> +        * The page could have changed compound pages due to race window.
>>>> +        * If this happens just bail out.
>>>> +        */
>>>> +       if (!PageHuge(p) || compound_head(p) != head) {
>>>> +               action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_DIFFERENT_COMPOUND, MF_IGNORED);
>>>> +               res = -EBUSY;
>>>> +               goto out;
>>>> +       }
>>>
>>> Let me have one comment on the diff. The result code MF_MSG_DIFFERENT_COMPOUND
>>> might not fit when PageHuge is false in the check (because it's no longer a
>>> compound page).  Maybe you may invent another result code, or changes
>>> MF_MSG_DIFFERENT_COMPOUND (for example) to MF_MSG_DIFFERENT_PAGE_SIZE?
>>>
>>
>> Suppose we do encounter this race.  Also, suppose p != head.
>> At the beginning of memory_failure_hugetlb, we do:
>>
>> struct page *head = compound_head(p);
>> ...
>> if (TestSetPageHWPoison(head))
>>
>> So, it could be that we set Poison in the 'head' page but the error was really
>> in another page.  Is that correct?
>>
>> Now with the race, head is not a huge page and the pages could even be on
>> buddy.  Does this mean we could have poison set on the wrong page in buddy?
> 
> Correct, the race might be rare, but this needs a fix.
> I think that setting PageHWPoison first (before taking refcount and page lock)
> is the root of all related problems.  This behavior came from the original
> concept in hwpoison that preventing consumption of corrupted data is the first
> priority.  But now I think that this makes no sense if we have this kind of bugs.
> 
> I'll try to write a patch for this (I only fix memory_failure_hugetlb() first,
> but generic path should be fixed later).
> Thank you for pointing out.

Many thanks for both of you for doing this. :)

> 
> - Naoya Horiguchi
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-08 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-28 14:02 [PATCH 0/4] A few fixup patches for memory failure Miaohe Lin
2022-02-28 14:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/memory-failure.c: fix race with changing page compound again Miaohe Lin
2022-03-04  8:26   ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-03-04 19:32     ` Mike Kravetz
2022-03-07  3:44       ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-07  7:01         ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-03-07 19:07           ` Mike Kravetz
2022-03-08  6:56             ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-03-08 11:28               ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-02-28 14:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/memory-failure.c: fix wrong user reference report Miaohe Lin
2022-03-04  8:27   ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-03-07 11:26     ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-07 20:14       ` Yang Shi
2022-03-08 13:11         ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-08 18:51           ` Yang Shi
2022-03-09  8:30             ` Miaohe Lin
2022-02-28 14:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/memory-failure.c: avoid calling invalidate_inode_page() with unexpected pages Miaohe Lin
2022-02-28 14:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/memory-failure.c: fix potential VM_BUG_ON_PAGE in split_huge_page_to_list Miaohe Lin
2022-03-04  8:28   ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-03-07  7:07     ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-07 19:53       ` Yang Shi
2022-03-08 12:36         ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-08 18:47           ` Yang Shi
2022-03-09  8:45             ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-10 11:46             ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-10 19:32               ` Yang Shi
2022-03-11  1:54                 ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63c118d0-da95-4b43-3d1b-1d69f8241801@huawei.com \
    --to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox