linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: validate buddy before check its migratetype.
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 19:48:58 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <63234E12-AF64-4D85-A2BF-8A4EF5359F91@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whZ7d8Z4rv5oV9+FLEEk_1A1X=JsJaeAmFZzhDxLqDLFg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1921 bytes --]

On 30 Mar 2022, at 19:03, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 3:12 PM Zi Yan <zi.yan@sent.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fixes: 1dd214b8f21c ("mm: page_alloc: avoid merging non-fallbackable pageblocks with others")
>
> Oh, btw - should this perhaps be backported further back than that
> alleged "fixes" commit?
>
> It does look like maybe the problem potentially existed before too,
> and was just much harder to trigger.
>
> That said, google doesn't find any other reports that look like
> Steven's oops, so maybe it really never happened and backporting isn't
> called for.
>
> Or possibly my google-fu is just bad.
>

There might not be any issue with the original code because this bug
could only be triggered when CONFIG_FLATMEM and CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION
are both set, which never happens, since CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION
depends on CONFIG_SPARSEMEM.

By checking Steven's boot log, it should be PFN 0x21ee00 that triggers
the bug, since the physical memory range ends at PFN 0x21edff.
PFN 0x21ee00 is 2MB aligned instead of MAX_ORDER-1 (4MB) aligned.
The original code assumes all physical memory ranges are at least
MAX_ORDER-1 aligned, which is true when CONFIG_SPARSEMEM is set
(CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION depends on it), since CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
allocates pageblock_flags array (the NULL-deferenced bitmap points
to) at section size granularity (128MB > 4MB). However, CONFIG_FLATMEM
does not do this. It allocates pageblock_flags array at the exact size
of the physical memory. So checking 0x21ee00 will not cause NULL
dereferencing when CONFIG_MEMORY_ISOLATION is set and the original
if statement can be true.

Now I am wondering if the page_is_buddy() check is correct for
CONFIG_FLATMEM. Is mem_map allocation aligned to MAX_ORDER-1
or just the present physical memory range? Is PageBuddy(0x21ee00)
accessing some random memory location?

--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-30 22:12 Zi Yan
2022-03-30 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-31  0:15   ` Zi Yan
2022-03-30 22:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2022-03-30 23:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-30 23:48   ` Zi Yan [this message]
2022-03-31  0:10     ` Zi Yan
2022-03-31  8:57       ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-03-31 22:07         ` Zi Yan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63234E12-AF64-4D85-A2BF-8A4EF5359F91@nvidia.com \
    --to=ziy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox