From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] mm/compaction: factor out code to test if we should run compaction for target order
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 20:10:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <631d62de-c9b5-3c5f-e0b3-df0109627a27@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b337eca-1c45-c802-0aea-50d8d149efb4@linux.alibaba.com>
on 8/15/2023 4:53 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 8/5/2023 7:07 PM, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>> We always do zone_watermark_ok check and compaction_suitable check
>> together to test if compaction for target order should be runned.
>> Factor these code out for preparation to remove repeat code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
>> ---
>> mm/compaction.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>> index b5a699ed526b..26787ebb0297 100644
>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>> @@ -2365,6 +2365,30 @@ bool compaction_zonelist_suitable(struct alloc_context *ac, int order,
>> return false;
>> }
>> +/*
>> + * Should we do compaction for target allocation order.
>> + * Return COMPACT_SUCCESS if allocation for target order can be already
>> + * satisfied
>> + * Return COMPACT_SKIPPED if compaction for target order is likely to fail
>> + * Return COMPACT_CONTINUE if compaction for target order should be runned
>> + */
>> +static inline enum compact_result
>> +compaction_suit_allocation_order(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order,
>> + int highest_zoneidx, unsigned int alloc_flags)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long watermark;
>> +
>> + watermark = wmark_pages(zone, alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_MASK);
>
> IIUC, the watermark used in patch 8 and patch 9 is different, right? Have you measured the impact of modifying this watermark?
>
Actually, there is no functional change intended. Consider wmark_pages with
alloc_flags = 0 is equivalent to min_wmark_pages, patch 8 and patch 9 still
use original watermark.
>> + if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, order, watermark, highest_zoneidx,
>> + alloc_flags))
>> + return COMPACT_SUCCESS;
>> +
>> + if (!compaction_suitable(zone, order, highest_zoneidx))
>> + return COMPACT_SKIPPED;
>> +
>> + return COMPACT_CONTINUE;
>> +}
>> +
>> static enum compact_result
>> compact_zone(struct compact_control *cc, struct capture_control *capc)
>> {
>> @@ -2390,19 +2414,11 @@ compact_zone(struct compact_control *cc, struct capture_control *capc)
>> cc->migratetype = gfp_migratetype(cc->gfp_mask);
>> if (compaction_with_allocation_order(cc->order)) {
>> - unsigned long watermark;
>> -
>> - /* Allocation can already succeed, nothing to do */
>> - watermark = wmark_pages(cc->zone,
>> - cc->alloc_flags & ALLOC_WMARK_MASK);
>> - if (zone_watermark_ok(cc->zone, cc->order, watermark,
>> - cc->highest_zoneidx, cc->alloc_flags))
>> - return COMPACT_SUCCESS;
>> -
>> - /* Compaction is likely to fail */
>> - if (!compaction_suitable(cc->zone, cc->order,
>> - cc->highest_zoneidx))
>> - return COMPACT_SKIPPED;
>> + ret = compaction_suit_allocation_order(cc->zone, cc->order,
>> + cc->highest_zoneidx,
>> + cc->alloc_flags);
>> + if (ret != COMPACT_CONTINUE)
>> + return ret;
>> }
>> /*
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-15 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-05 11:07 [PATCH 0/9] Fixes and cleanups to compaction Kemeng Shi
2023-08-05 3:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-05 4:07 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-05 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm/compaction: call list_is_{first}/{last} more intuitively in move_freelist_{head}/{tail} Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 7:49 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-05 11:07 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm/compaction: remove repeat compact_blockskip_flush check in reset_isolation_suitable Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 8:42 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-05 11:07 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm/compaction: rename is_via_compact_memory to compaction_with_allocation_order Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 8:58 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-15 12:04 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-19 12:14 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 1:51 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-24 2:20 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-05 11:07 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm/compaction: factor out code to test if we should run compaction for target order Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 8:53 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-15 12:10 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2023-08-19 12:27 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 1:57 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-24 2:25 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-24 2:59 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-05 11:07 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm/compaction: call compaction_suit_allocation_order in kcompactd_do_work Kemeng Shi
[not found] ` <20230805110711.2975149-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
2023-08-05 17:11 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm/compaction: use correct list in move_freelist_{head}/{tail} Andrew Morton
2023-08-07 0:37 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 7:16 ` Baolin Wang
[not found] ` <20230805110711.2975149-4-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
2023-08-15 8:28 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm/compaction: correctly return failure with bogus compound_order in strict mode Baolin Wang
2023-08-15 9:22 ` Kemeng Shi
[not found] ` <20230805110711.2975149-5-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
2023-08-15 8:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm/compaction: simplify pfn iteration in isolate_freepages_range Baolin Wang
2023-08-15 9:32 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-15 10:07 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-15 10:37 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-19 11:58 ` Baolin Wang
2023-08-22 1:37 ` Kemeng Shi
2023-08-24 2:19 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=631d62de-c9b5-3c5f-e0b3-df0109627a27@huaweicloud.com \
--to=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox