From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/28] arm64: mte: CPU feature detection and initial sysreg configuration
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 09:53:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61bba3c1948651a5221b87f2dfa2872f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200824182758.27267-4-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
On 2020-08-24 19:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
>
> Add the cpufeature and hwcap entries to detect the presence of MTE. Any
> secondary CPU not supporting the feature, if detected on the boot CPU,
> will be parked.
>
> Add the minimum SCTLR_EL1 and HCR_EL2 bits for enabling MTE. The Normal
> Tagged memory type is configured in MAIR_EL1 before the MMU is enabled
> in order to avoid disrupting other CPUs in the CnP domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v8:
> - Move the SCTLR_EL1, MAIR_EL1, GCR_EL1 and TFSR*_EL1
> initialisation to
> __cpu_setup before the MMU is enabled. While early MAIR_EL1 is
> desirable to avoid conflicting with other CPUs in a CnP domain
> the
> TFSR_EL1 and GCR_EL1 will only come in handy later when support
> for
> in-kernel MTE is added.
>
> v7:
> - Hide the MTE ID register field for guests until MTE gains support
> for KVM.
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h | 3 ++-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/mm/proc.S | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 10 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> index 07b643a70710..1937653b05a3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@
> #define ARM64_BTI 54
> #define ARM64_HAS_ARMv8_4_TTL 55
> #define ARM64_HAS_TLB_RANGE 56
> +#define ARM64_MTE 57
>
> -#define ARM64_NCAPS 57
> +#define ARM64_NCAPS 58
>
> #endif /* __ASM_CPUCAPS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 89b4f0142c28..680b5b36ddd5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -681,6 +681,12 @@ static __always_inline bool
> system_uses_irq_prio_masking(void)
> cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING);
> }
>
> +static inline bool system_supports_mte(void)
> +{
> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_MTE) &&
> + cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_MTE);
> +}
> +
> static inline bool system_has_prio_mask_debugging(void)
> {
> return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_DEBUG_PRIORITY_MASKING) &&
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h
> index 22f73fe09030..0d4a6741b6a5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hwcap.h
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
> #define KERNEL_HWCAP_DGH __khwcap2_feature(DGH)
> #define KERNEL_HWCAP_RNG __khwcap2_feature(RNG)
> #define KERNEL_HWCAP_BTI __khwcap2_feature(BTI)
> -/* reserved for KERNEL_HWCAP_MTE __khwcap2_feature(MTE) */
> +#define KERNEL_HWCAP_MTE __khwcap2_feature(MTE)
>
> /*
> * This yields a mask that user programs can use to figure out what
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> index 8a1cbfd544d6..6c3b2fc922bb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
> HCR_AMO | HCR_SWIO | HCR_TIDCP | HCR_RW | HCR_TLOR | \
> HCR_FMO | HCR_IMO)
> #define HCR_VIRT_EXCP_MASK (HCR_VSE | HCR_VI | HCR_VF)
> -#define HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS (HCR_RW | HCR_API | HCR_APK)
> +#define HCR_HOST_NVHE_FLAGS (HCR_RW | HCR_API | HCR_APK | HCR_ATA)
> #define HCR_HOST_VHE_FLAGS (HCR_RW | HCR_TGE | HCR_E2H)
Why is HCR_ATA only set for nVHE? HCR_EL2.ATA seems to apply to both,
doesn't it?
>
> /* TCR_EL2 Registers bits */
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 077293b5115f..59b91f58efec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -1131,6 +1131,8 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu,
> if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
> val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_SVE_SHIFT);
> val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR0_AMU_SHIFT);
> + } else if (id == SYS_ID_AA64PFR1_EL1) {
> + val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64PFR1_MTE_SHIFT);
Hiding the capability is fine, but where is the handling of trapping
instructions done? They should result in an UNDEF being injected.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-25 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-24 18:27 [PATCH v8 00/28] arm64: Memory Tagging Extension user-space support Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 01/28] arm64: mte: system register definitions Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 02/28] arm64: mte: Use Normal Tagged attributes for the linear map Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 03/28] arm64: mte: CPU feature detection and initial sysreg configuration Catalin Marinas
2020-08-25 8:53 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-08-25 10:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-08-25 13:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-08-26 17:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-09-04 10:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-08-26 15:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 04/28] arm64: mte: Add specific SIGSEGV codes Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 05/28] arm64: mte: Handle synchronous and asynchronous tag check faults Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 06/28] mm: Add PG_arch_2 page flag Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 07/28] mm: Preserve the PG_arch_2 flag in __split_huge_page_tail() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 08/28] arm64: mte: Clear the tags when a page is mapped in user-space with PROT_MTE Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 09/28] arm64: mte: Tags-aware copy_{user_,}highpage() implementations Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 10/28] arm64: Avoid unnecessary clear_user_page() indirection Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 11/28] arm64: mte: Tags-aware aware memcmp_pages() implementation Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 12/28] mm: Introduce arch_calc_vm_flag_bits() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 13/28] arm64: mte: Add PROT_MTE support to mmap() and mprotect() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 14/28] mm: Introduce arch_validate_flags() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 15/28] arm64: mte: Validate the PROT_MTE request via arch_validate_flags() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 16/28] mm: Allow arm64 mmap(PROT_MTE) on RAM-based files Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 17/28] arm64: mte: Allow user control of the tag check mode via prctl() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 18/28] arm64: mte: Allow user control of the generated random tags " Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 19/28] arm64: mte: Restore the GCR_EL1 register after a suspend Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 20/28] arm64: mte: Allow {set,get}_tagged_addr_ctrl() on non-current tasks Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 21/28] arm64: mte: ptrace: Add PTRACE_{PEEK,POKE}MTETAGS support Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 22/28] arm64: mte: ptrace: Add NT_ARM_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL regset Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 23/28] fs: Handle intra-page faults in copy_mount_options() Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 24/28] mm: Add arch hooks for saving/restoring tags Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 25/28] arm64: mte: Enable swap of tagged pages Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 26/28] arm64: mte: Save tags when hibernating Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 27/28] arm64: mte: Kconfig entry Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-08-25 11:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-08-24 18:27 ` [PATCH v8 28/28] arm64: mte: Add Memory Tagging Extension documentation Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61bba3c1948651a5221b87f2dfa2872f@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pcc@google.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox