From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/7] Sparsemem Virtual Memmap V5 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:37:47 -0700 Message-ID: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A01EA65B9@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Luck, Tony" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft , Nick Piggin , Mel Gorman List-ID: > How many tests were done and on what platform? Andy's part 0/7 post starts off with the performance numbers. He didn't say which ia64 platform was used for the tests. Looking my logs for the last few kernel builds (some built on a tiger_defconfig kernel which uses CONFIG_VIRTUAL_MEM_MAP=y, and some with the new CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) I'd have a tough time saying whether there was a regression or not). -Tony -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org