From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] memory tiering: introduce folio_use_access_time() check
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 09:01:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60b10c39-3675-4cbc-96d8-2b6f1170464d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240724130115.793641-3-ziy@nvidia.com>
On 2024/7/24 21:01, Zi Yan wrote:
> If memory tiering mode is on and a folio is not in the top tier memory,
> folio's cpupid field is repurposed to store page access time. Instead of
> an open coded check, use a function to encapsulate the check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 6 ++++++
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +--
> mm/huge_memory.c | 6 ++----
> mm/memory-tiers.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> mm/memory.c | 3 +--
> mm/mprotect.c | 3 +--
> 6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 17753a463e01..2c6ccf088c7b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1717,6 +1717,8 @@ static inline void vma_set_access_pid_bit(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> __set_bit(pid_bit, &vma->numab_state->pids_active[1]);
> }
> }
> +
> +bool folio_use_access_time(struct folio *folio);
> #else /* !CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> static inline int folio_xchg_last_cpupid(struct folio *folio, int cpupid)
> {
> @@ -1770,6 +1772,10 @@ static inline bool cpupid_match_pid(struct task_struct *task, int cpupid)
> static inline void vma_set_access_pid_bit(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> }
> +static inline bool folio_use_access_time(struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS) || defined(CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 9057584ec06d..416e29b56cc4 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1840,8 +1840,7 @@ bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct folio *folio,
> * The pages in slow memory node should be migrated according
> * to hot/cold instead of private/shared.
> */
> - if (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING &&
> - !node_is_toptier(src_nid)) {
> + if (folio_use_access_time(folio)) {
> struct pglist_data *pgdat;
> unsigned long rate_limit;
> unsigned int latency, th, def_th;
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 15234b2e252e..5c0a6a4e3a6e 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -1707,8 +1707,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> * For memory tiering mode, cpupid of slow memory page is used
> * to record page access time. So use default value.
> */
> - if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING) ||
> - node_is_toptier(nid))
> + if (!folio_use_access_time(folio))
> last_cpupid = folio_last_cpupid(folio);
> target_nid = numa_migrate_prep(folio, vmf, haddr, nid, &flags);
> if (target_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> @@ -2061,8 +2060,7 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> toptier)
> goto unlock;
>
> - if (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING &&
> - !toptier)
> + if (folio_use_access_time(folio))
> folio_xchg_access_time(folio,
> jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies));
> }
> diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> index 4775b3a3dabe..2a642ea86cb2 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/memory.h>
> #include <linux/memory-tiers.h>
> #include <linux/notifier.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/sysctl.h>
>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> @@ -50,6 +51,24 @@ static const struct bus_type memory_tier_subsys = {
> .dev_name = "memory_tier",
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> +/**
> + * folio_use_access_time - check if a folio reuses cpupid for page access time
> + * @folio: folio to check
> + *
> + * folio's _last_cpupid field is repurposed by memory tiering. In memory
> + * tiering mode, cpupid of slow memory folio (not toptier memory) is used to
> + * record page access time.
> + *
> + * Return: the folio _last_cpupid is used to record page access time
> + */
> +bool folio_use_access_time(struct folio *folio)
> +{
> + return (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING) &&
> + !node_is_toptier(folio_nid(folio));
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> static int top_tier_adistance;
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 802d0d8a40f9..833d2cad6eb2 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -5337,8 +5337,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> * For memory tiering mode, cpupid of slow memory page is used
> * to record page access time. So use default value.
> */
> - if ((sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING) &&
> - !node_is_toptier(nid))
> + if (folio_use_access_time(folio))
> last_cpupid = (-1 & LAST_CPUPID_MASK);
> else
> last_cpupid = folio_last_cpupid(folio);
> diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> index 222ab434da54..37cf8d249405 100644
> --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -161,8 +161,7 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) &&
> toptier)
> continue;
> - if (sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING &&
> - !toptier)
> + if (folio_use_access_time(folio))
> folio_xchg_access_time(folio,
> jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies));
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-25 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-24 13:01 [PATCH v3 0/3] Various memory tiering fixes Zi Yan
2024-07-24 13:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] memory tiering: read last_cpupid correctly in do_huge_pmd_numa_page() Zi Yan
2024-07-24 13:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] memory tiering: introduce folio_use_access_time() check Zi Yan
2024-07-24 14:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-25 1:01 ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2024-07-24 13:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] memory tiering: count PGPROMOTE_SUCCESS when mem tiering is enabled Zi Yan
2024-07-24 14:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-07-25 1:00 ` Kefeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60b10c39-3675-4cbc-96d8-2b6f1170464d@huawei.com \
--to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox