From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: memcg: slab control
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:15:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <604427e00911262315n5d520cf4p447f68e7053adc11@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B0E7530.8050304@parallels.com>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> wrote:
>> Aren't there patches to make the kernel track which cgroup caused
>> which disk I/O? If so, it should be possible to charge the bios to the
>> right cgroup.
>>
>> Maybe one way to decide which kernel allocations should be accounted
>> would be to look at the calling context: If the allocation is done in
>> user context (syscall), then it could be counted towards that user,
>> while if the allocation is done in interrupt or kthread context, it
>> shouldn't be accounted.
>>
>> Of course, this wouldn't be perfect, but it might be a good enough
>> approximation.
>
> I disagree. Bio-s are allocated in user context for all typical reads
> (unless we requested aio) and are allocated either in pdflush context
> or (!) in arbitrary task context for writes (e.g. via try_to_free_pages)
> and thus such bio/buffer_head accounting will be completely random.
>
> One of the way to achieve the goal I can propose the following (it's
> not perfect, but just smth to start discussion from).
>
> We implement support for accounting based on a bit on a kmem_cache
> structure and mark all kmalloc caches as not-accountable. Then we grep
> the kernel to find all kmalloc-s and think - if a kmalloc is to be
> accounted we turn this into kmem_cache_alloc() with dedicated
> kmem_cache and mark it as accountable.
Well it would be nice to count all kernel memory allocations
trigger-able by user programs, the kernel
memory includes kernel slabs as well as the pages directly allocated
by get_free_pages(). However some
of the allocations happen asynchronously like in kernel thread or
interrupt context. We can not charge them
on the random process happen to run at the time.
We can either not count those allocations, or do some special
treatment to remember who owns those allocations.
In our networking intensive workload, it causes us lots of trouble of
miscounting the networking slabs for incoming
packets. So we make changes in the networking stack which records the
owner of the socket and then charge the
slab later using that recorded information.
--Ying
>> -- Suleiman
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-27 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-25 23:08 David Rientjes
2009-11-26 1:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-26 8:50 ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-26 8:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-26 9:10 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-11-26 9:33 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-26 9:56 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-11-26 10:24 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2009-11-26 12:31 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-11-26 12:52 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2009-12-01 7:40 ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-27 7:15 ` Ying Han [this message]
2009-11-27 9:45 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-12-01 5:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-30 22:57 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-01 10:31 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-12-01 22:29 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-01 7:36 ` Balbir Singh
2009-12-01 10:40 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-12-01 15:14 ` Balbir Singh
2009-12-02 10:14 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-12-02 10:19 ` Balbir Singh
2009-12-02 10:51 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-11-30 22:55 ` David Rientjes
2009-12-01 10:39 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2009-11-26 10:13 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2009-11-30 9:17 ` Balbir Singh
2009-11-30 22:45 ` David Rientjes
2009-11-26 1:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-11-26 10:01 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2009-11-26 2:35 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-27 7:01 ` Ying Han
2009-11-27 9:48 ` Pavel Emelyanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=604427e00911262315n5d520cf4p447f68e7053adc11@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yinghan@google.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox