From: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Mike Waychison" <mikew@google.com>,
"Rohit Seth" <rohitseth@google.com>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hugh@veritas.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Török Edwin" <edwintorok@gmail.com>,
"Lee Schermerhorn" <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>,
"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@suse.de>,
"Wu Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH][0/2]page_fault retry with NOPAGE_RETRY
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:02:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <604427e00904081302p7aad170bu5ff0702415455f7@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
changelog[v3]:
- applied fixes and cleanups from Wu Fengguang.
filemap VM_FAULT_RETRY fixes
[PATCH 01/14] mm: fix find_lock_page_retry() return value parsing
[PATCH 02/14] mm: fix major/minor fault accounting on retried fault
[PATCH 04/14] mm: reduce duplicate page fault code
[PATCH 05/14] readahead: account mmap_miss for VM_FAULT_RETRY
- split the patch into two parts. first part includes FAULT_FLAG_RETRY
support with no current user change. second part includes individual
per-architecture cleanups that enable FAULT_FLAG_RETRY.
currently there are mainly two users for handle_mm_fault, we enable
FAULT_FLAG_RETRY for actual fault handler and leave get_user_pages
unchanged.
Benchmarks:
posted on [V1]:
case 1. one application has a high count of threads each faulting in
different pages of a hugefile. Benchmark indicate that this double data
structure walking in case of major fault results in << 1% performance hit.
case 2. add another thread in the above application which in a tight loop
of
mmap()/munmap(). Here we measure loop count in the new thread while other
threads doing the same amount of work as case one. we got << 3% performance
hit on the Complete Time(benchmark value for case one) and 10% performance
improvement on the mmap()/munmap() counter.
This patch helps a lot in cases we have writer which is waitting behind all
readers, so it could execute much faster.
some new test results from Wufengguang:
Just tested the sparse-random-read-on-sparse-file case, and found the
performance impact to be 0.4% (8.706s vs 8.744s). Kind of acceptable.
without FAULT_FLAG_RETRY:
iotrace.rb --load stride-100 --mplay /mnt/btrfs-ram/sparse 3.28s user
5.39s system 99% cpu 8.692 total
iotrace.rb --load stride-100 --mplay /mnt/btrfs-ram/sparse 3.17s user
5.54s system 99% cpu 8.742 total
iotrace.rb --load stride-100 --mplay /mnt/btrfs-ram/sparse 3.18s user
5.48s system 99% cpu 8.684 total
FAULT_FLAG_RETRY:
iotrace.rb --load stride-100 --mplay /mnt/btrfs-ram/sparse 3.18s user
5.63s system 99% cpu 8.825 total
iotrace.rb --load stride-100 --mplay /mnt/btrfs-ram/sparse 3.22s user
5.47s system 99% cpu 8.718 total
iotrace.rb --load stride-100 --mplay /mnt/btrfs-ram/sparse 3.13s user
5.55s system 99% cpu 8.690 total
In the above faked workload, the mmap read page offsets are loaded from
stride-100 and performed on /mnt/btrfs-ram/sparse, which are created by:
seq 0 100 1000000 > stride-100
dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs-ram/sparse bs=1M count=1 seek=1024000
Signed-off-by: Ying Han <yinghan@google.com>
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 20 ++++++++++++++
include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
include/linux/mm.h | 2 +
mm/filemap.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
mm/memory.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++------
5 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-08 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-08 20:02 Ying Han [this message]
2009-04-09 7:36 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=604427e00904081302p7aad170bu5ff0702415455f7@mail.gmail.com \
--to=yinghan@google.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=edwintorok@gmail.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox