From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zps77.corp.google.com (zps77.corp.google.com [172.25.146.77]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id mB2IkhnJ009037 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:46:43 -0800 Received: from qyk10 (qyk10.prod.google.com [10.241.83.138]) by zps77.corp.google.com with ESMTP id mB2IkXE7007123 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:46:41 -0800 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so5424298qyk.18 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:46:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1228223933.30995.28.camel@lts-notebook> References: <1228223933.30995.28.camel@lts-notebook> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:46:41 -0800 Message-ID: <604427e00812021046p3ebd6e24xf92e6ab29df35686@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [BUG] mmotm-081130: null pointer deref in sigkill_pending() From: Ying Han Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: linux-kernel , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , Hugh Dickins List-ID: On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > While testing mmotm [11/29, 11/30, likely in 12/01], I came across the > following bug after ~2 hours of heavy stress on x86_64 [same bug/trace > hit on ia64]: > > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000038 > IP: [] sigkill_pending+0x19/0x30 > PGD 63be12067 PUD 7fd0cc067 PMD 0 > Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC > last sysfs file: /sys/block/hda/removable > CPU 7 > Modules linked in: sunrpc ipv6 dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod rfkill input_polldev pci_slot parport_pc lp parport ide_cd_mod cdrom serio_raw hpilo hpwdt button amd_rng pata_acpi i2c_amd756 libata i2c_core pcspkr mptspi mptscsih sym53c8xx scsi_transport_spi sd_mod scsi_mod mptbase ext3 jbd ehci_hcd ohci_hcd uhci_hcd > Pid: 19530, comm: ps Not tainted 2.6.28-rc6-mmotm-081130-2235 #10 > RIP: 0010:[] [] sigkill_pending+0x19/0x30 > RSP: 0018:ffff8806a64efd38 EFLAGS: 00010246 > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000000e RCX: ffff8805fc96fb00 > RDX: ffff8806a64efe38 RSI: 00007fff62423000 RDI: ffff88020c87abe0 > RBP: ffff8806a64efd38 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8806a64efe30 > R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8805fc96fb00 > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000010 R15: ffff8806a64efe30 > FS: 00007f32d4ac46f0(0000) GS:ffff8807fed46d80(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b > CR2: 0000000000000038 CR3: 0000000784571000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 > DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > Process ps (pid: 19530, threadinfo ffff8806a64ee000, task ffff88062cf6d7c0) > Stack: > ffff8806a64efdb8 ffffffff80298986 0000000000000001 ffff88062cf6d7c0 > ffff8803ad100680 ffff88020c87abe0 0000000000000000 ffff8806a64efe38 > ffff8806a64efe30 00000001804f0765 00007fff624236be 0000000000000000 > Call Trace: > [] __get_user_pages+0x166/0x440 > [] get_user_pages+0x32/0x40 > [] access_process_vm+0x10b/0x1e0 > [] proc_pid_cmdline+0x90/0x120 > [] ? alloc_pages_current+0xa8/0x100 > [] proc_info_read+0x9b/0xe0 > [] vfs_read+0xc4/0x160 > [] sys_read+0x50/0x90 > [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > Code: e8 08 83 e0 01 c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f6 87 49 05 00 00 01 55 b8 01 00 00 00 48 89 e5 75 12 48 8b 87 10 05 00 00 <48> 8b 40 38 48 c1 e8 08 83 e0 01 c9 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 > RIP [] sigkill_pending+0x19/0x30 > RSP > CR2: 0000000000000038 > ---[ end trace 80efa2c8bcce4fdc ]--- > > Ad hoc instrumentation showed that this is likely the result of the > "make-get_user_pages-interruptible" patch in mmotm. The test workload > includes a number of tasks that repeatedly run a list of miscellaneous > programs, including ps(1). Occasionally, ps will catch a task with a > NULL "tsk->signal" [exiting?], resulting in a null pointer deref in > sigkill_pending() called from __get_user_pages(). > > Before the aforementioned patch, sigkill_pending() was only called from > ptrace_stop() for tsk == current. The comment block on ptrace_stop() > says: "This must be called with current->sighand->siglock held." So, > it doesn't look safe to call sigkill_pending() from > __get_user_pages()--especially on a task != current--without similar > locking. > > I'm not sure what the correct fix should be here. I made a fix for the patch as Oleg suggested which replace the sigkill_pending() as fatal_signal_pending(). Andrew deleted the original patch from mm tree this morning and i am about the post the new patch with the fix. > > Related: the patch and it's update add the following to > __get_user_pages(): > > if (unlikely(sigkill_pending(current) || > sigkill_pending(tsk))) > return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS; > > As a minimum, I don't think we want to call the second sigkill_pending() > unless tsk != current. In most cases, (current == tsk) in get_user_pages. However in some situation current is calling get_user_pages on behalf of tsk and we want to interrupt the allocation in this case as well. I might change it something like this: > if (unlikely(sigkill_pending(current) || > ((current != tsk) && sigkill_pending(tsk)))) > return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS; > > Lee > > > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org