From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] MM updates for 6.10-rc1
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 14:02:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5qcafqbnrox7r5m4kghgykahtp2pusmhwfxqzrmhgvavxxsdux@ao2tce7nppey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whSiUg7dggHaBLULuF6_GB6NORLDByog0p=Qo+0ewmZSA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 09:48:49AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2024 at 08:32, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to take this pull and fix up the cases I find, but I'm not
> > happy with this kind of trivial C preprocessor misuse.
>
> I did some other maco handling cleanup too and tried to regularize
> some of this all, and it seems to work for me. But somebody should
> double-check, and it's possible these patterns should all be
> regularized further with a few helper macros for the whole "add
> __GFP_ZERO to argument list" or similar.
I just double checked slab.h, gfp.h and percpu.h, and scanned through
the diff vs. 6.9 for include/linux/ - looks like you got everything.
I think we can slim down the API surface of slab.h some more too, we're
now exposing three different ways of saying "trace/track this allocation
here": _trace, _track_caller and _noprof vs. normal; I think after a
cycle we can see if the old variants are still needed or can be
consolidated somehow.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-19 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-18 2:22 Andrew Morton
2024-05-19 15:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-19 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-19 18:02 ` Kent Overstreet [this message]
2024-05-19 21:16 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-05-19 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2024-05-19 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-19 18:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-19 16:49 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5qcafqbnrox7r5m4kghgykahtp2pusmhwfxqzrmhgvavxxsdux@ao2tce7nppey \
--to=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox