linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com,
	Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, rppt@kernel.org,
	surenb@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, jannh@google.com,
	pfalcato@suse.de, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	sunnanyong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/mincore: Use can_pte_batch_count() in mincore_pte_range() for pte batch mincore_pte_range()
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 19:34:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fb39e3f-a2d2-496b-9a04-0aa9d33c3189@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027140315.907864-3-zhangqilong3@huawei.com>

On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 10:03:14PM +0800, Zhang Qilong wrote:
> In current mincore_pte_range(), if pte_batch_hint() return one
> pte, it's not efficient, just call new added can_pte_batch_count().
>
> In ARM64 qemu, with 8 CPUs, 32G memory, a simple test demo like:
> 1. mmap 1G anon memory
> 2. write 1G data by 4k step
> 3. mincore the mmaped 1G memory
> 4. get the time consumed by mincore
>
> Tested the following cases:
>  - 4k, disabled all hugepage setting.
>  - 64k mTHP, only enable 64k hugepage setting.
>
> Before
>
> Case status | Consumed time (us)  |
> ----------------------------------|
> 4k          | 7356                |
> 64k mTHP    | 3670                |
>
> Pathed:
>
> Case status | Consumed time (us)  |
> ----------------------------------|
> 4k          | 4419                |
> 64k mTHP    | 3061                |
>
> The result is evident and demonstrate a significant improvement in
> the pte batch. While verification within a single environment may
> have inherent randomness. there is a high probability of achieving
> positive effects.

Recent batch PTE series seriously regressed non-arm, so I'm afraid we can't
accept any series that doesn't show statistics for _other platforms_.

Please make sure you at least test x86-64.

This code is very sensitive and we're not going to accept a patch like this
without _being sure_ it's ok.

>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong <zhangqilong3@huawei.com>
> ---
>  mm/mincore.c | 10 +++-------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mincore.c b/mm/mincore.c
> index 8ec4719370e1..2cc5d276d1cd 100644
> --- a/mm/mincore.c
> +++ b/mm/mincore.c
> @@ -178,18 +178,14 @@ static int mincore_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>  		/* We need to do cache lookup too for pte markers */
>  		if (pte_none_mostly(pte))
>  			__mincore_unmapped_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE,
>  						 vma, vec);
>  		else if (pte_present(pte)) {
> -			unsigned int batch = pte_batch_hint(ptep, pte);
> -
> -			if (batch > 1) {
> -				unsigned int max_nr = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> -
> -				step = min_t(unsigned int, batch, max_nr);
> -			}
> +			unsigned int max_nr = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> +			step = can_pte_batch_count(vma, ptep, &pte,
> +						   max_nr, 0);
>  			for (i = 0; i < step; i++)
>  				vec[i] = 1;
>  		} else { /* pte is a swap entry */
>  			*vec = mincore_swap(pte_to_swp_entry(pte), false);
>  		}
> --
> 2.43.0
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-27 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-27 14:03 [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm: PTEs batch optimization in mincore and mremap Zhang Qilong
2025-10-27 14:03 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mm: Introduce can_pte_batch_count() for PTEs batch optimization Zhang Qilong
2025-10-27 19:24   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-27 19:51     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-27 20:21       ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-27 14:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/mincore: Use can_pte_batch_count() in mincore_pte_range() for pte batch mincore_pte_range() Zhang Qilong
2025-10-27 19:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-27 19:34   ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2025-10-27 14:03 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mm/mremap: Use can_pte_batch_count() instead of folio_pte_batch() for pte batch Zhang Qilong
2025-10-27 19:41   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-27 19:57   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-10-28 11:13 [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm/mincore: Use can_pte_batch_count() in mincore_pte_range() for pte batch mincore_pte_range() zhangqilong
2025-10-28 11:32 zhangqilong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5fb39e3f-a2d2-496b-9a04-0aa9d33c3189@lucifer.local \
    --to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sunnanyong@huawei.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangqilong3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox