linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: vdso: Remove redundant ifdeffery around in_ia32_syscall()
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:10:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f32ff04-5e3a-49b2-8d97-c95c149d001f@t-8ch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8734m7d1bt.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>

Hi Eric,

On 2024-09-10 09:34:46+0000, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> writes:
> 
> > The ifdefs only guard code that is also guarded by in_ia32_syscall(),
> > which already contains the same ifdefs itself.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c | 4 ----
> >  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c
> > index 9059b9d96393..ab2b011471e0 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.c
> > @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ static vm_fault_t vdso_fault(const struct vm_special_mapping *sm,
> >  static void vdso_fix_landing(const struct vdso_image *image,
> >  		struct vm_area_struct *new_vma)
> >  {
> > -#if defined CONFIG_X86_32 || defined CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION
> >  	if (in_ia32_syscall() && image == &vdso_image_32) {
> >  		struct pt_regs *regs = current_pt_regs();
> >  		unsigned long vdso_land = image->sym_int80_landing_pad;
> > @@ -86,7 +85,6 @@ static void vdso_fix_landing(const struct vdso_image *image,
> >  		if (regs->ip == old_land_addr)
> >  			regs->ip = new_vma->vm_start + vdso_land;
> >  	}
> > -#endif
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int vdso_mremap(const struct vm_special_mapping *sm,
> > @@ -339,7 +337,6 @@ int compat_arch_setup_additional_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm,
> >  
> >  bool arch_syscall_is_vdso_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  {
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32) || defined(CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION)
> >  	const struct vdso_image *image = current->mm->context.vdso_image;
> >  	unsigned long vdso = (unsigned long) current->mm->context.vdso;
> >  
> > @@ -348,7 +345,6 @@ bool arch_syscall_is_vdso_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  		    regs->ip == vdso + image->sym_vdso32_rt_sigreturn_landing_pad)
> >  			return true;
> >  	}
> > -#endif
> >  	return false;
> >  }
> 
> Have you tested to verify that after this change
> arch_syscall_is_vdso_signature compiles out the "image" and "vdso"
> variables?

Yes, I did:

$ objdump --disassemble=arch_syscall_is_vdso_sigreturn arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.o
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vma.o:     file format elf64-x86-64

Disassembly of section .text:

00000000000007f0 <arch_syscall_is_vdso_sigreturn>:
 7f0:	f3 0f 1e fa          	endbr64
 7f4:	e8 00 00 00 00       	call   7f9 <arch_syscall_is_vdso_sigreturn+0x9>
 7f9:	31 c0                	xor    %eax,%eax
 7fb:	e9 00 00 00 00       	jmp    800 <arch_syscall_is_vdso_sigreturn+0x10>


> 
> If the compilers don't it might be worth it rearrange the code as:
> 	if (in_ia32_syscall()) {
> 		const struct vdso_image *image = current->mm->context.vdso_image;
> 		unsigned long vdso = (unsigned long) current->mm->context.vdso;
> 
> 		if (image == &vdso_image_32) {
>                 	....
>                         return true;
>                 }
> 	}
>         return false.
> 
> Making the variables depend upon in_ia32_syscall() so you can be certain
> they are compiles out.

If that structure is preferred I can send a v2.


Thomas


  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-10 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-10 10:11 [PATCH 0/2] x86: vdso: Two small ifdef cleanups Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: vdso: Remove ifdeffery around page setup variants Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: vdso: Remove redundant ifdeffery around in_ia32_syscall() Thomas Weißschuh
2024-09-10 14:34   ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-09-10 18:10     ` Thomas Weißschuh [this message]
2025-04-22 12:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86: vdso: Two small ifdef cleanups Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f32ff04-5e3a-49b2-8d97-c95c149d001f@t-8ch.de \
    --to=linux@weissschuh.net \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox