From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@google.com>, Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Cc: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <david@redhat.com>,
<lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
<ziy@nvidia.com>, <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
<Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>, <npache@redhat.com>,
<ryan.roberts@arm.com>, <dev.jain@arm.com>, <baohua@kernel.org>,
<nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>, <farrah.chen@intel.com>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: prevent poison consumption when splitting THP
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 20:29:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f117b73-8d7b-b233-a0a8-2a29ea6312a8@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACw3F50ijQ20Vg8ycMROSCccf_XtjB_fFvLGxvQZ7eaNQoLwGQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2025/9/29 5:55, Jiaqi Yan wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2025 at 8:30 PM Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborowski@intel.com>
>>
>> When performing memory error injection on a THP (Transparent Huge Page)
>> mapped to userspace on an x86 server, the kernel panics with the following
>> trace. The expected behavior is to terminate the affected process instead
>> of panicking the kernel, as the x86 Machine Check code can recover from an
>> in-userspace #MC.
>>
>> mce: [Hardware Error]: CPU 0: Machine Check Exception: f Bank 3: bd80000000070134
>> mce: [Hardware Error]: RIP 10:<ffffffff8372f8bc> {memchr_inv+0x4c/0xf0}
>> mce: [Hardware Error]: TSC afff7bbff88a ADDR 1d301b000 MISC 80 PPIN 1e741e77539027db
>> mce: [Hardware Error]: PROCESSOR 0:d06d0 TIME 1758093249 SOCKET 0 APIC 0 microcode 80000320
>> mce: [Hardware Error]: Run the above through 'mcelog --ascii'
>> mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check: Data load in unrecoverable area of kernel
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal local machine check
>>
>> The root cause of this panic is that handling a memory failure triggered by
>> an in-userspace #MC necessitates splitting the THP. The splitting process
>> employs a mechanism, implemented in try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage(), which
>> reads the sub-pages of the THP to identify zero-filled pages. However,
>> reading the sub-pages results in a second in-kernel #MC, occurring before
>> the initial memory_failure() completes, ultimately leading to a kernel
>> panic. See the kernel panic call trace on the two #MCs.
>>
>> First Machine Check occurs // [1]
>> memory_failure() // [2]
>> try_to_split_thp_page()
>> split_huge_page()
>> split_huge_page_to_list_to_order()
>> __folio_split() // [3]
>> remap_page()
>> remove_migration_ptes()
>> remove_migration_pte()
>> try_to_map_unused_to_zeropage()
>
> Just an observation: Unfortunately THP only has PageHasHWPoisoned and
> don't know the exact HWPoisoned page. Otherwise, we may still use
> zeropage for these not HWPoisoned.
IIUC, the raw error page will have HWPoisoned flag set while the THP has
PageHasHWPoisoned set. So I think we could use zeropage for healthy sub-pages.
Thanks.
.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-29 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-28 3:28 Qiuxu Zhuo
2025-09-28 21:55 ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-09-29 12:29 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2025-09-29 13:57 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-09-29 15:15 ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-09-29 13:27 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-09-29 15:51 ` Luck, Tony
2025-09-29 16:30 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-09-29 17:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-30 1:48 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-30 8:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-30 10:13 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-30 10:20 ` Lance Yang
2025-09-29 7:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-29 13:52 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-09-29 16:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-12 1:37 ` Wei Yang
2025-10-12 4:23 ` Jiaqi Yan
2025-10-11 7:55 ` [PATCH v2 " Qiuxu Zhuo
2025-10-11 9:09 ` Lance Yang
2025-10-11 18:18 ` Andrew Morton
2025-10-12 1:23 ` Wei Yang
2025-10-13 17:15 ` Zi Yan
2025-10-14 2:42 ` Miaohe Lin
2025-10-14 14:19 ` [PATCH v3 " Qiuxu Zhuo
2025-10-14 14:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-14 14:51 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2025-10-15 6:49 ` [PATCH v4 " Qiuxu Zhuo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f117b73-8d7b-b233-a0a8-2a29ea6312a8@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.zaborowski@intel.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=farrah.chen@intel.com \
--cc=jiaqiyan@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox