From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] slab, rcu: move and consolidate TINY_RCU kvfree_rcu() to SLAB
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 11:07:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee3321c-417a-4638-8d9e-77faa5f07462@paulmck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250203-slub-tiny-kfree_rcu-v1-0-d4428bf9a8a1@suse.cz>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:28:46AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Following the move of the TREE_RCU batching kvfree_rcu() implementation
> to slab, we still have the simple non-batching implementation in tiny
> RCU, and RCU implementation specific ifdefs in slab code.
>
> Finish the move and integration into slab. Allow using the simple
> call_rcu() based implementation also with tree RCU when SLUB_TINY is
> enabled, as its goal is also to limit memory footprint with less concern
> for top performance.
>
> In order to avoid RCU having to recognize the fake callback function
> pointers (__is_kvfree_rcu_offset()) when handling call_rcu(), implement
> a callback that can calculate the object's address from the embedded
> rcu_head pointer without knowing the specific offset (previously SLOB
> would not have made it possible, but it's gone now).
>
> After this series, AFAIK only the following kvfree_rcu specific code
> remains in RCU:
>
> - a call to kfree_rcu_scheduler_running() from rcu_set_runtime_mode()
>
> - probably necessary and a generic registration interface would be
> unnecessary bloat?
I am OK with this calling directly.
Alternatively, you could create a core_initcall() that did nothing
but invoke kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(), and then drop that call from
rcu_set_runtime_mode(). Up to you guys!
> - declarations of kfree_rcu() API in include/linux/rcupdate.h
>
> - could be moved to slab.h after checking for/fixing up potential
> missing includes
It would be good to move them, but no real hurry from this end.
> git tree:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/log/?h=b4/slub-tiny-kfree_rcu
>
> Changes since RFC [1]:
> - Rebased to v6.14-rc1
> - Fixed build errors reported by bots.
> - Changed where kvfree_call_rcu() is moved to in patch 1 to avoid another
> move in patch 4.
> - R-b's by Ulad and Joel
> - Fix a memory leak in kvfree_rcu_list() thanks to Ulad
> - Various comments' improvements and fixes (Joel, Ulad)
> - Rename config to CONFIG_KFREE_RCU_BATCHED (Ulad)
>
> Due to changes, didn't keep Paul's Tested-by (but thanks!)
I re-ran the tests, so feel free to add it back in. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> Will include in slab/for-next if no objection.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250123-slub-tiny-kfree_rcu-v1-0-0e386ef1541a@suse.cz/
>
> To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
> Cc: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
> Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
> Vlastimil Babka (4):
> slab, rcu: move TINY_RCU variant of kvfree_rcu() to SLAB
> rcu: remove trace_rcu_kvfree_callback
> rcu, slab: use a regular callback function for kvfree_rcu
> slab: don't batch kvfree_rcu() with SLUB_TINY
>
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> include/linux/rcutiny.h | 36 ------------------------------------
> include/linux/rcutree.h | 3 ---
> include/linux/slab.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> include/trace/events/rcu.h | 34 ----------------------------------
> kernel/rcu/tiny.c | 25 -------------------------
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 9 ++-------
> mm/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> mm/slab.h | 2 ++
> mm/slab_common.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> mm/slub.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 11 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 2014c95afecee3e76ca4a56956a936e23283f05b
> change-id: 20250123-slub-tiny-kfree_rcu-bd65bfe222f2
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-03 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-03 9:28 Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-03 9:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] slab, rcu: move TINY_RCU variant of " Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-04 9:50 ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03 9:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] rcu: remove trace_rcu_kvfree_callback Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05 9:28 ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03 9:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] rcu, slab: use a regular callback function for kvfree_rcu Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05 9:13 ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03 9:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] slab: don't batch kvfree_rcu() with SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05 9:40 ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03 19:07 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2025-02-04 10:02 ` [PATCH 0/4] slab, rcu: move and consolidate TINY_RCU kvfree_rcu() to SLAB Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-04 11:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05 9:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ee3321c-417a-4638-8d9e-77faa5f07462@paulmck-laptop \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox