linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] slab, rcu: move and consolidate TINY_RCU kvfree_rcu() to SLAB
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 11:07:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee3321c-417a-4638-8d9e-77faa5f07462@paulmck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250203-slub-tiny-kfree_rcu-v1-0-d4428bf9a8a1@suse.cz>

On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:28:46AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Following the move of the TREE_RCU batching kvfree_rcu() implementation
> to slab, we still have the simple non-batching implementation in tiny
> RCU, and RCU implementation specific ifdefs in slab code.
> 
> Finish the move and integration into slab. Allow using the simple
> call_rcu() based implementation also with tree RCU when SLUB_TINY is
> enabled, as its goal is also to limit memory footprint with less concern
> for top performance.
> 
> In order to avoid RCU having to recognize the fake callback function
> pointers (__is_kvfree_rcu_offset()) when handling call_rcu(), implement
> a callback that can calculate the object's address from the embedded
> rcu_head pointer without knowing the specific offset (previously SLOB
> would not have made it possible, but it's gone now).
> 
> After this series, AFAIK only the following kvfree_rcu specific code
> remains in RCU:
> 
> - a call to kfree_rcu_scheduler_running() from rcu_set_runtime_mode()
> 
>   - probably necessary and a generic registration interface would be
>     unnecessary bloat?

I am OK with this calling directly.

Alternatively, you could create a core_initcall() that did nothing
but invoke kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(), and then drop that call from
rcu_set_runtime_mode().  Up to you guys!

> - declarations of kfree_rcu() API in include/linux/rcupdate.h
> 
>   - could be moved to slab.h after checking for/fixing up potential
>     missing includes

It would be good to move them, but no real hurry from this end.

> git tree:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/log/?h=b4/slub-tiny-kfree_rcu
> 
> Changes since RFC [1]:
> - Rebased to v6.14-rc1
> - Fixed build errors reported by bots.
> - Changed where kvfree_call_rcu() is moved to in patch 1 to avoid another
>   move in patch 4.
> - R-b's by Ulad and Joel
> - Fix a memory leak in kvfree_rcu_list() thanks to Ulad
> - Various comments' improvements and fixes (Joel, Ulad)
> - Rename config to CONFIG_KFREE_RCU_BATCHED (Ulad)
> 
> Due to changes, didn't keep Paul's Tested-by (but thanks!)

I re-ran the tests, so feel free to add it back in.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

> Will include in slab/for-next if no objection.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250123-slub-tiny-kfree_rcu-v1-0-0e386ef1541a@suse.cz/
> 
> To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
> Cc: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
> Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
> Vlastimil Babka (4):
>       slab, rcu: move TINY_RCU variant of kvfree_rcu() to SLAB
>       rcu: remove trace_rcu_kvfree_callback
>       rcu, slab: use a regular callback function for kvfree_rcu
>       slab: don't batch kvfree_rcu() with SLUB_TINY
> 
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h   | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  include/linux/rcutiny.h    | 36 ------------------------------------
>  include/linux/rcutree.h    |  3 ---
>  include/linux/slab.h       | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  include/trace/events/rcu.h | 34 ----------------------------------
>  kernel/rcu/tiny.c          | 25 -------------------------
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c          |  9 ++-------
>  mm/Kconfig                 |  4 ++++
>  mm/slab.h                  |  2 ++
>  mm/slab_common.c           | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  mm/slub.c                  | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  11 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 2014c95afecee3e76ca4a56956a936e23283f05b
> change-id: 20250123-slub-tiny-kfree_rcu-bd65bfe222f2
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-03 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-03  9:28 Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-03  9:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] slab, rcu: move TINY_RCU variant of " Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-04  9:50   ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03  9:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] rcu: remove trace_rcu_kvfree_callback Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05  9:28   ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03  9:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] rcu, slab: use a regular callback function for kvfree_rcu Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05  9:13   ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03  9:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] slab: don't batch kvfree_rcu() with SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-05  9:40   ` Harry (Hyeonggon) Yoo
2025-02-03 19:07 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2025-02-04 10:02   ` [PATCH 0/4] slab, rcu: move and consolidate TINY_RCU kvfree_rcu() to SLAB Vlastimil Babka
2025-02-04 11:41     ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-02-05  9:54 ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5ee3321c-417a-4638-8d9e-77faa5f07462@paulmck-laptop \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox