linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
To: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	linux-man@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: correct and update UFFDIO_API ioctl error codes
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 01:52:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ddepg57wqnidtvsio2pse44dot6pvr3rcmhwld6ml3sflwcz3@ijd3h4teqblr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919190206.388896-8-axelrasmussen@google.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2180 bytes --]

Hi Axel,

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 12:02:03PM -0700, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> First, it is not correct that repeated UFFDIO_API calls result in
> EINVAL. This is true *if both calls enable features*, but in the case
> where we're doing a two-step feature detection handshake, the kernel
> explicitly expects 2 calls (one with no features set). So, correct this
> description.
> 
> Then, some new error cases have been added to the kernel recently, and
> the man page wasn't updated to note these. So, add in descriptions of
> these new error cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
> ---
>  man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2 b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> index 53b1f473f..1aa9654be 100644
> --- a/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> +++ b/man2/ioctl_userfaultfd.2
> @@ -280,17 +280,31 @@ refers to an address that is outside the calling process's
>  accessible address space.
>  .TP
>  .B EINVAL
> -The userfaultfd has already been enabled by a previous
> -.B UFFDIO_API
> -operation.
> -.TP
> -.B EINVAL
>  The API version requested in the
>  .I api
>  field is not supported by this kernel, or the
>  .I features
>  field passed to the kernel includes feature bits that are not supported
>  by the current kernel version.
> +.TP
> +.B EPERM

This EPERM should probably be at the end.  Unless you have a good reason
to break alphabetic order.

Thanks,
Alex

> +The
> +.B UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK
> +feature was enabled,
> +but the calling process doesn't have the
> +.B CAP_SYS_PTRACE
> +capability.
> +.TP
> +.B EINVAL
> +A previous
> +.B UFFDIO_API
> +call already enabled one or more features for this userfaultfd.
> +Calling
> +.B UFFDIO_API
> +twice,
> +the first time with no features set,
> +is explicitly allowed
> +as per the two-step feature detection handshake.
>  .\" FIXME In the above error case, the returned 'uffdio_api' structure is
>  .\" zeroed out. Why is this done? This should be explained in the manual page.
>  .\"
> -- 
> 2.42.0.459.ge4e396fd5e-goog
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-25 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230919190206.388896-1-axelrasmussen@google.com>
2023-09-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 01/10] userfaultfd.2: briefly mention two-step feature handshake process Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:26   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09  8:38   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 02/10] userfaultfd.2: reword to account for new fault resolution ioctls Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:29   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09  8:39   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:01 ` [PATCH 03/10] userfaultfd.2: comment on feature detection in the example program Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:32   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09  8:40   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: describe two-step feature handshake Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:44   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09  8:42   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-09 10:58     ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: describe missing UFFDIO_API feature flags Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:50   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-10-09  8:45   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-09 10:49     ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: correct and update UFFDIO_API ioctl error codes Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:52   ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2023-10-09  8:49     ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-09 11:01       ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: clarify the state of the uffdio_api structure on error Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-25 23:56   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-09-26 17:58     ` Axel Rasmussen
2023-10-09  9:03   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: fix / update UFFDIO_REGISTER error code list Axel Rasmussen
2023-09-19 19:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: document new UFFDIO_POISON ioctl Axel Rasmussen
2023-10-09  9:09   ` Mike Rapoport
2023-10-10 17:13     ` Axel Rasmussen
     [not found] ` <20230919190206.388896-5-axelrasmussen@google.com>
2023-09-25 23:37   ` [PATCH 04/10] ioctl_userfaultfd.2: fix a few trivial mistakes Alejandro Colomar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5ddepg57wqnidtvsio2pse44dot6pvr3rcmhwld6ml3sflwcz3@ijd3h4teqblr \
    --to=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox